Дипломная (вкр): Predicting completion of cash acquisitions using option implied risk-neutral probabilities

Внимание! Если размещение файла нарушает Ваши авторские права, то обязательно сообщите нам

4. Excess returns for different merger arbitrage strategies.

 

Return, %

HFRX Merger Arbitrage Index return, %

Excess return, %

Portfolio 1

2,7%

0,3%

2,4%

Portfolio 2

2,7%

0,3%

2,4%

Portfolio 3

2,9%

0,3%

2,6%

Portfolio 4

4,2%

0,4%

3,8%



Conclusion and further remarks

paper contributes to literature by outlining an “easy to implement” way to estimate risk-neutral probability of a M&A deal success from option prices and conducting empirical analysis of its predictive power on the basis of a sample of cash tender offers for the period of 4 years (2010 to 2013). In conclusion, empirical study suggests that option prices embed significant predictive content for forecasting outcomes of cash acquisitions. Forecasting power of the risk-neutral probabilities increases monotonically closer to the resolution date. However, despite the above-mentioned inference risk-neutral probability forecasts appear to be poorly calibrated. Options market tends to under predict the probability of success, suggesting excess returns opportunities. The above-mentioned inference provides a starting point for further research that could focus on option market arbitrage strategies for companies that are subject to a takeover bid.

Comparative analysis of option implied and stock-implied probabilities suggest that both probability estimates are worth of consideration. For the period shortly after the announcement date stock market reacts to strongly and tends to over predict the success probability, while option market provide more accurate forecasts. Closer to deal resolution, however, stock market adjusts and “naïve” stock-derived probabilities become better estimates than risk-neutral ones. Additionally, combination of stock market and option market probability forecasts outperform models based on isolated information from either of the markets. All of the above suggests that proposed method for risk-neutral probability estimation could be of use in relation to deal outcome prediction, especially when used together with other probability estimating models. basic analysis of excess returns associated with merger arbitrage reveals that on the basis of the chosen sample a portfolio of high risk-neutral success probability stocks generate a slightly higher excess return than a simple “invest in all” portfolio. This empirical finding provides a vast area for further research. For example, the study could extend to determine the optimal portfolio weights that should be assigned to stocks depending on their option-implied success probability. in all, risk-neutral probability estimates obtained in this paper could serve as a starting point for analysis of arbitrage strategies in both, derivatives and stock market. It should be also mentioned, however, that probabilistic forecasts’ estimation and testing, especially of those that rely on option market, put many restriction on the sample data and have, indeed, limited area of application.

References


1)      Ait-Sahalia, Y., Lo A., 1998. Non-parametric estimation of state-price densities implicit in financial asset prices, Journal of Finance 53, 499-547.

)        Ait-Sahalia, Y., Lo A., 2000. Non-parametric risk management and implied risk aversion, Journal of Econometrics 94, 9-51.

)        Ait-Sahalia, Y., Wang Y., Yared F., 2001. Do option markets correctly price the probabilities of movement of the underlying asset?, Journal of Econometrics 102, 67-110.

4)      Baker, Malcolm, and Serkan Savaşoglu, 2002, Limited arbitrage in mergers and acquisitions, Journal of Financial Economics 64, 91-115.

)        Barone-Adesi, Giovanni, Keith C. Brown, and W.V. Harlow, 1994. On the Use of Implied Volatilities in the Prediction of Successful Corporate Takeovers, Advances in Futures and Options Research, 7, 147-165.

)        Barraclough, Kathryn, David T Robinson, Tom Smith, and Robert E Whaley, 2013. Using option prices to infer overpayments and synergies in M&A transactions, Review of Financial Studies 26, 695-722.

)        Basset, Gibert W. Jr., 1997. Nonparametric bounds for the probability of future prices based on option values, IMS Lecture Notes - Monograph Series, 31.

)        Bliss, Robert R., and Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, 2002.Testing the stability of implied probability density functions, Journal of Banking and Finance 26, 381-422.

)        Breeden, D., Litzenberger, R., 1978. Prices of state-contingent claims implicit in option prices. Journal of Business 51, 621-651.

)        Brown, Keith C., and Michael V. Raymond 1986: Risk Arbitrage and the Prediction of Successful Corporate Takeovers, Financial Management, 15, 54-63.

)        Cao, Charles, Zhiwu Chen, and John M. Griffin, 2005, Informational Content of Option Volume Prior to Takeovers, Journal of Business, forthcoming.

)        Cox, J.C., Ross, S.A., 1976. The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 145-166.

)        Gelman, S., 2004. Dynamics of target stock price by mergers and acquisitions under uncertainty of the deal completion. Presentations Journal of the Joint Conference of the European Economic Association and Econometric Society European Meeting (temporary electronic publication; http://www.eeaesem2004.org)

)        Gelman, S., 2005. Do option prices support the subjective probabilities of takeover completion derived from spot prices? (electronic publication; eb.econ.ku.dk/fru/conference/Programme/Saturday/E4/Gelman_2paper_v14.pdf)

)        Jackwerth, Jens C., and Mark Rubinstein (1996): Recovering Probability Distributions from Option Prices, Journal of Finance 51, 1611-1631.

)        Jaymaran N., Mandelker G., Shastri K., 1991, Market anticipation of merger activities: An empirical test, Journal of Managerial and Decision Economics 12, 439-448.

)        Levy H., Yoder J.A., 1993. The behaviour of option implied standard deviations around Merger and Acquisition announcements, The Financial Review 28, 262-272.

)        Martinez V. H., Rosu I., Bester A.C., 2009. Option pricing on cash mergers, (electronic publication; http://www.hec.unil.ch/documents/sem_ibf/Rosu.pdf)

)        Mitchell, Mark, and Todd Pulvino, 2001, Characteristics of risk and return in risk arbitrage, The Journal of Finance 56, 2135-2175.

)        Murphy Allan H., 1973. A new vector partition of the probability score, Journal of Applied Meteorology 12, 595-600

)        Rubinstein, Mark, 1994. Implied binomial trees, The Journal of Finance 69, pp.771-818

)        Samuelson, William, and Leonard Rosenthal, 1986. Price Movements as Indicators of Tender Offer Success, Journal of Finance 41, 481-499.

)        Shimko, David, 1993. Bounds of probability RISK 6, 33-37.

)        Subramanian, Ajay, 2004. Option Pricing on Stocks in Mergers and Acquisitions, Journal of Finance 59, 795-829.

)        Walkling, Ralph A, 1985. Predicting tender offer success: A logistic analysis, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 20, 461-478.

)        Wang, Louis, 2009. Implied volatilities in Mergers and Acquisitions, Wharton Research Scholars Journal, April 2009, dissertation paper.

Источник: https://www.bibliofond.ru/detail.aspx?id=880570