114 |
3.1.6 Geometrical optics |
[Ref. p. 131 |
||||||||||||||||
Table 3.1.11 continued. |
||||||||||||||||||
E ect |
Figure |
ABCD-matrix |
Remark |
|||||||||||||||
Gaussian |
1 |
0 |
The amplitude transmission function |
|||||||||||||||
apodization, |
i λ a |
1 |
between I2 and O is |
|||||||||||||||
usable for |
− |
2 π |
exp −a x /2 , |
|||||||||||||||
q-parameter |
λ : wavelength |
x: |
transverse coordinate |
|||||||||||||||
transfer |
||||||||||||||||||
I O |
of light |
[86Sie, p. 787] |
||||||||||||||||
(Table 3.1.18) |
||||||||||||||||||
Remark : Other treatments of the mirror see [86Sie, 98Sve, 75Ger]. |
||||||||||||||||||
Table 3.1.12. ABCD-matrices for non-symmetrical optical elements without torsion. |
||||||||||||||||||
E ect |
Figure |
ABCD-matrix |
Remark |
|||||||||||||||
Refraction |
2 |
cos (θ1) |
0 |
n1 sin (θ1) = n2 sin (θ2) |
||||||||||||||
at a sphere |
||||||||||||||||||
cos (θ2) |
||||||||||||||||||
Tangential |
1 |
∆ nt |
n1 cos (θ2) |
(Snell’s law) |
||||||||||||||
r n2 |
n2 cos (θ1) |
|||||||||||||||||
n2 |
||||||||||||||||||
(meridional) |
n |
1 |
∆ nt = |
n2 cos (θ2) − n1 cos (θ1) |
||||||||||||||
plane |
||||||||||||||||||
cos (θ1) cos (θ2) |
||||||||||||||||||
Sagittal |
|
plane |
|
n1 |
n2 |
1 |
0 |
∆ ns = n2 cos (θ2) − n1 cos (θ1) |
||
∆ ns |
n1 |
|||
r n2 |
n2 |
|||
Rowland |
||
concave |
2 |
|
grating |
||
1 |
||
(unfolded) |
||
Tangential |
Radius of curvature r |
|
(meridional) |
||
plane |
Sagittal plane
A B
,
C D
A = cos (θ1) ; cos (θ2)
B = 0 ;
C = − 2 cos (θ2) ; r t cos (θ1)
D = A .
0 |
||
12 |
1 |
|
− rs |
||
Grating equation (3.1.52):
λ
sin (θ1) + sin (θ2) = m g ,
2 r cos2 (θ2)
r t = cos (θ1) + cos (θ2)
2 r
rs = cos (θ1) + cos (θ2) ,
general corrected holographical gratings: see [81Gue]
Spherical |
Specialization of the |
concave |
Rowland grating to |
mirror |
g ∞ , |
θ1 = θ2 . |
Landolt-B¨ornstein
New Series VIII/1A1
Ref. p. 131] |
3.1 Linear optics |
115 |
Table 3.1.13. Distances between cardinal elements of an optical system: F , F : objectand image-space focal points, respectively; H, H : objectand image-space principal points, respectively; I, O: input and output plane, respectively. The order of points determines the signs.
Distance between |
A, B, C, and D |
||||||||
two points |
for n1 = n2 |
||||||||
D |
|||||||||
I F |
|||||||||
C |
|||||||||
1 |
|||||||||
F H |
− |
||||||||
C |
|||||||||
A |
|||||||||
O F |
− |
||||||||
C |
|||||||||
1 |
|||||||||
H F |
|||||||||
− C |
|||||||||
Table 3.1.14. The meaning of the vanishing of di erent elements of the ABCD-matrix.
Element |
Figure |
Remark |
|||||||
A = 0 |
0 |
B |
x2 = B α1 |
||||||
C D |
Focusing of collimated light into the |
||||||||
I |
O |
image-side focal plane. |
|||||||
B = 0 |
A 0 |
x2 = A x1 |
|||||||
C D |
The input plane is imaged to the |
||||||||
O |
output plane (conjugated planes). |
||||||||
I |
A : magnification of imaging; |
||||||||
appl.: calculation of image plane. |
|||||||||
C = 0 |
A B |
α2 = D α1 |
|||||||
0 D |
Transformation of collimated light |
||||||||
I |
O |
into collimated light. |
|||||||
D : angular magnification; |
|||||||||
telescope (afocal system). |
|||||||||
D = 0 |
A B |
α2 = C x1 |
|||||||
C |
0 |
Collimation of divergent pencil of |
|||||||
I |
O |
rays. |
|||||||
C : power of the element or system. |
|||||||||
x2 |
Axx Axy Bxx Bxy |
x1 |
||||||||||
y2 |
= |
Ayx Ayy Byx Byy |
y1 |
or |
||||||||
α |
C |
C |
D |
D |
α |
|||||||
β2 |
Cxx |
Cxy |
Dxx |
Dxy |
β1 |
|||||||
2 |
yx |
yy |
yx |
yy |
1 |
|||||||
γ2 |
= |
C D |
γ1 |
= S |
γ1 |
(3.1.99) |
|||
r2 |
A B |
r1 |
r1 |
with the matrices A, B, C, D, and S given by comparison with the more detailed representations. Identities between the matrices, characteristic for the symplectic geometry (see Sect. 3.1.6.2.6),
are: A DT − B CT = I ; A BT = B AT ; C DT = D CT , and det |
A B |
= |
n |
|||
C D |
n , where T means the |
|||||
Landolt-B¨ornstein
New Series VIII/1A1
116 |
3.1.6 Geometrical optics |
[Ref. p. 131 |
x
y1
1
1
x1 |
z |
|
y |
Fig. 3.1.35. Three-dimensional ray in the input plane I. |
transposition of the matrix and I the identity matrix [86Sie, 05Hod]. The matrix S contains at most 10 independent parameters [76Arn, 86Sie, 05Hod].
In Table 3.1.15 general ray-transfer matrices are given.
A general astigmatic system can be generated by two cylindrical lenses with their axes non-parallel and non-orthogonal, separated by a distance L: SGA = R−1 Scyl,1 R SL Scyl,2 .
Symplectic optical systems in the paraxial range can be described by the formalism of the symplectic geometry [03Wal]. They can be generated by a finite number of cylindrical and spherical lenses separated by free spaces. The mathematical formulation is connected with the matrix properties given in Sect. 3.1.6.2.4. For theoretical foundation and practical calculations see [64Lun, p. 216], [83Mac, 85Sud, 86Sie, 99Gao, 05Gro1, 05Hod].
The geometric optical calculations of misalignments with matrix techniques require, generally, higher dimensional matrices [05Gro1, p. 51], for example 3 × 3-matrices [86Sie] or 4 × 4-matrices [85Wan] for two-dimensional problems or 6 × 6-matrices for three-dimensional problems [76Arn].
Landolt-B¨ornstein
New Series VIII/1A1
Ref. p. 131] |
3.1 Linear optics |
117 |
Table 3.1.15. General ray-transfer matrices [99Gao, 05Hod].
E ect of the matrix |
Matrix |
|||||||
Free propagation, |
1 0 |
z |
0 |
|||||
0 |
, length z |
0 1 |
00 |
z |
||||
index n |
0 0 |
n |
00 |
|||||
SL = |
1 |
|||||||
0 0 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
Aligned spherical thin lens, |
0 |
1 |
0 0 |
|||||||
focal length f |
||||||||||
1 |
0 |
0 0 |
||||||||
Ssph = |
f |
0 |
1 0 |
|||||||
1 |
||||||||||
0 |
− |
0 1 |
||||||||
f |
||||||||||
Aligned cylindrical thin lens |
1 |
0 0 0 |
||||||||
0 |
1 0 0 |
|||||||||
fx |
||||||||||
Scyl = |
−1 |
0 1 0 |
||||||||
0 |
0 0 1 |
|||||||||
Cylindrical telescope,
m and n are the magnifications along x- and y-axis, respectively
Rotation of the x-y-plane by the angle θ : given a system matrix S, then the rotated system matrix
Srot = R−1 (θ) S (θ = 0) R (θ)
with R−1 (θ) = R (−θ) = RT (θ)
m 0 |
0 |
0 |
||||||||
SM = |
0 n |
0 |
0 |
|||||||
0 |
0 |
0 |
n−1 |
|||||||
0 |
0 |
m−1 |
0 |
|||||||
R = |
− sin θ cos θ |
0 |
0 |
|||||||
cos |
θ |
sin |
θ |
0 |
0 |
|||||
0 |
0 |
sin θ cos θ |
||||||||
0 |
0 |
cos θ |
sin θ |
|||||||
− |
||||||||||
Corrections beyond the paraxial range are required by large object-space aperture light sources like semiconductor lasers (large vertical far-field angles) or large image-space aperture laser focusing optics like CD-optics.
Shape factor of a lens:
q = |
r2 |
+ r1 |
. |
(3.1.100) |
r2 |
||||
− r1 |
||||
Shape factor and spherical aberration for focusing of light:
– Minimum of spherical aberration:
r1 |
= |
n (2n − 1) − 4 |
. |
r2 |
|||
n (2n + 1) |
|||
Landolt-B¨ornstein
New Series VIII/1A1
118 |
3.1.6 Geometrical optics |
[Ref. p. 131 |
|||
h |
h |
r1 |
r2 |
r1 |
Plane |
Fig. 3.1.36. Focusing of incident collimated light by (a) a
general lens with curvature radii r1 and r2, (b) a plano-convex |
|||||||
a |
b |
lens with shape factor q = 1. |
|||||
– |
Refractive index n = 1.5 |
r1 |
= − |
1 |
q = 0.7 . |
||
r2 |
6 |
||||||
– |
r1 |
1 |
q = 1 (plano-convex lens), spherical aberration near to minimum. |
||||
r2 |
∞ |
||||||
In Fig. 3.1.36 the focusing of incident collimated light by (a) a general lens with curvature radii r1 and r2 and (b) a plano-convex lens with shape factor q = 1 is shown.
In Table 3.1.16 the third-order spherical aberration and coma for a thin plano-convex lens is given in comparison with the di raction-limited resolution for a plane wave or Gaussian illumination.
Remark 1 : Third-order formulae for finite object distance: see [88Kle, 76Jen], more general: [80Hof, 86Haf, 96Ped, 99Bor].
Remark 2 : About further third-order aberrations as astigmatism, field curvature, image distortion: see [76Jen, 78Dri, 80Hof, 86Haf, 88Kle, 96Ped, 99Bor].
Remark 3 : The third-order aberrations are not exactly valid for higher apertures. Example: The third-order
spherical aberration deviates for 2h/f = 1/5 by ≈ 2 % from the ray-tracing values (the limit, recommended in [74Sle] for estimations), h/f = 3/10 : ≈ 15 % deviation [76Jen]. Therefore, the ray tracing should be
preferred for larger deviations from the paraxial case. It is the base of modern commercial optical design programs.
Example 3.1.14. Given: a plano-convex lens after Fig. 3.1.36b with the radius of the spherical surface r1 = 5 mm, n = 1.5, collimated light with wavelength λ = 1 µm, stop with a height h = 1.5 mm, and a fiber with core diameter 2 r = 100 µm and numerical aperture N.A. = 0.2. Required: a geometric-optical estimation on the hits of the core of the fiber by the rays in the
paraxial focal point and in the point of least confusion (Fig. 3.1.37). From (3.1.101)–(3.1.105): f = 10 mm, ∆sl = −262 µm, |∆st | = 39 µm, ∆slc = −210 µm, |∆stc| = 16 µm, ∆stb = 4 µm, and ∆stg = 2.1 µm. In the paraxial focal plane as well as in the plane of least confusion, the
hits of the fiber core by rays are closer than 50 µm to the optical axis and the angles of the rays with the optical axis are ≤ 0.15 within the fiber aperture. Therefore, all rays are accepted by a step-index fiber. About the analog task for Gaussian beams see references in Sect. 3.1.7.5.4 and commercial optical design programs, which show in this case, that a large part of radiation is coupled in higher-order modes.
Landolt-B¨ornstein
New Series VIII/1A1