29. Barthes R. Rhйtorique de l'image // Communication, n°4, 1964.
30. Ding E. 2010. “Cassirer in the Context of Saussurean Semiotics.” Chinese Semiotic Studies 3: 56-67. doi: 10.1515/css-2010-0107.
31. Dreyfus H. Being and Power: Heidegger and Foucault // International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 1996. Vol. 4, №1. P. 1-16.
32. Foucault M. Histoire de la sexualitй. T.I: La volontй de savoir, Paris, 1976.
33. Keenan T. The “Paradox” of Knowledge and Power: Reading Foucault on a Bias // Political Theory, 1987. Vol. 15, №1. P. 5-37.
34. Murphy J.B. Nature, Custom, and Stipulation in the Semiotic of John Poinsot.-1991-Semiotica 83 (1-2):33-68.
35. O'Neil Spady J. Reconsidering Theory: Power, the Learning Body, and Cultural Change during Early American Colonization // Journal of Early American History 1 (2011). P.191-214.
36. Oesterle J.A. Another approach to the problem of meaning. The Thomist 1, 1944. P.233-263.
37. Philp M. Foucault on Power: A Problem in Radical Translation? // Political Theory, 1983. Vol. 11, №1. P. 29-52.
38. Posner R. Basic Tasks of Cultural SemioticsBasic Tasks of Cultural Semiotics. In: Gloria Withalm and Josef Wallmannsberger (eds.) (2004), Signs of Power - Power of Signs. Essays in Honor of Jeff Bernard. Vienna: INST, p. 56-89. P.56
39. Selg P., Ventsel A. An Outline for semiotic theory of hegemony // Semiotica, 2010, 182[1/4], pp. 443 - 473.
40. Siefkes M. Power in society, economy, and mentality: Towards a semiotic theory of power // Semiotica 181 (1/4). 2010. P. 226, 230-231.
41. Signs of change: premodern, modern, postmodern / ed. Barker S. International Association for Philosophy and Literature. Meeting Universitй de Montrйal) State University of New York Press, 1991. 440 p.
42. Tractatus de Signis: The Semiotic of John Poinsot. Ed., Deely J.N. Publisher, University of California Press, 1985. 607 p.