Статья: Нормативность, экспертиза и эпистемологический патернализм в философии науки, обзор номеров журнала Метафилософия

Внимание! Если размещение файла нарушает Ваши авторские права, то обязательно сообщите нам

Список литературы / References

1. Cling, 2014 - Cling, A.D. “The Epistemic Regress Problem, the Problem of the Criterion, and the Value of Reasons”, Metaphilosophy, 2014, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 161-171.

2. Croce, 2018 - Croce, M. “Epistemic Paternalism and the Service Conception of Epistemic Authority”, Metaphilosophy, 2018, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 305-327.

3. Kaiser, 2019 - Kaiser, M.I. “Normativity in the Philosophy of Science”, Metaphilosophy, 2019, vol. 50, no. 1-2, pp. 36-62.

4. Kingsbury, Dare, 2017 - Kingsbury, J. & Dare, T. “The Philosophical Use And Misuse Of Science”, Metaphilosophy, 2017, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 449-466

5. Kostikova, 2013 - Kostikova, A.A. “Postmodernism: a Feminist Critique” Metaphilosophy, 2013, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 25-28.

6. Kuznetsov, 2013 - Kuznetsov, V.G. “Russian Phenomenology, or the Interrupted Flight”, Metaphilosophy, 2013, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 32-36.

7. Mironov, 2013 - Mironov, V.V. “On Progress in Philosophy”, Metaphilosophy,

8. vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 10-14.

9. Momdjan, 2013 - Momdjan, K. “Does Current Social Philosophy Develop Progressively?”, Metaphilosophy, 2013, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 19-23.

10. Peijnenburg, Aikin, 2014 - Peijnenburg, J. & Aikin, S.F. “Symposium the Regress Problem: Metatheory, Development, and Criticism. Introduction” Metaphilosophy,

11. vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 139-145.

12. Seyedsayamdost, 2019 - Seyedsayamdost, H. “Philosophical Expertise and Philosophical Methodology. A Clearer Division and Notes on the Expertise Debate”, Metaphilosophy, 2019, vol. 50, no. 1-2, pp. 110-129

13. Sorial, 2014 - Sorial, S. “The Legitimacy of Pseudo-Expert Discourse in the Public Sphere”, Metaphilosophy, 2014, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 304-324.

Размещено на Allbest

Источник: https://otherreferats.allbest.ru/download/1318127/