Статья: Проблема связи между религиозностью и рождаемостью: на основе интервью с семьями священников Русской Православной Церкви

Mitrofanov, G., archpriest. (2007) “Voprosy sem'i i braka. Vystuplenie na kruglom stole `Sem'ia v sovremennoi Tserkvi '” [Family and marriage issues. Speech at the round table `Family in the modern Church], Alfa i Omega 49 [https://tinyurl.com/ mr25rsbn, accessed on 09.04.2020].

Paisij Sviatogorec, geronda. (2007) Slova. Tom IV. Semejnaia zhizn' [Spiritual Counsels, Vol. 4: Family Life]. M.: “Holy Mountain” Publishing house.

Pavliutkin, I. V. (2021) “Kak voznikaet obshchnost' v brake: logika vzaimnosti v narrativakh zhion iz mnogodetnykh semei” [How the sense of community arises in marriage: the logic of mutuality in the narratives of women from large families], Ekonomich- eskaia sotsiologiia 4: 11-34.

Pavliutkin, I. V., Goleva, M. A., Borisova, O. N. (2021) More zhizni: Kak rozhdaiutsia mno- godetnye sem'i v sovremennoi Rossii [Sea of life: How large families are born in modern Russia]. M.: St. Tikhon's Orthodox University Press.

Pestov, N. E. (2002) Puti k sovershennoi radosti. Sushhnost i tseli braka [Ways to perfect joy. The essence and goals of marriage]. M.: Aksios.

Philipov, D., Berghammer, C. (2007) “Religion and Fertility Ideals, Intentions and Behavior: a Comparative Study of European Countries”, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 5: 271-305.

Praz, A.-F. (2009) “Religion, Masculinity and Fertility Decline: A Comparative Analysis of Protestant and Catholic Culture (Switzerland 1890-1930)”, The History of the Family 14 (1): 88-106.

Pruckova, E. V., Markin K. V. (2017) “Tipologiia pravoslavnyKh rossiian: problema konstru- irovaniia obobshhennogo pokazatelia religioznosti” [Typology of Orthodox Russians: the problem of constructing a generalized religiosity indicator], Sotsiolog- icheskie Issledovaniia 8: 95-105.

Rusterholz, C. (2015) “Reproductive Behavior and Contraceptive Practices in Comparative Perspective, Switzerland (1955-1970)”, The History of the Family 20 (1): 41-68.

Sherman, N. (1989) The Fabric of Character: Aristotle's Theory of Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sigareva, E. P., Sivopliasova, S.Iu. (2019) “Rozhdaemost' i religioznost' v Rossii: otsenka vzaimosviazi” [Fertility and religiosity in Russia: an assessment of the relationship], Logos et Praxis 1: 104-115.

Sinel'nikov, A. B., Medkov V. M., Antonov A. I. (2009) Sem'ia i vera v sotsiologicheskom izmerenii (rezul'taty mezhregional'nogo i mezhkonfessional'nogo issledovaniia) [Family and faith in the sociological dimension (the results of inter-regional and inter-confessional research)]. M.: KDU.

Somers, A., Van Poppel, F. (2003) “Catholic Priests and the Fertility Transition Among Dutch Catholics, 1935-1970”, Annales de demographie historique 106: 57-88.

Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (2001) Osnovy kachestvennogo issledovaniia: obosnovannaia teor- iia, protsedury i tekhniki [Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory]. M.: Editorial URSS.

Tkachev, A., archpriest. (2016) “Predokhranenie -- eto grekh?” [Is contraception a sin?], Teleperedacha `Korotko o glavnom', December 8 [https://elitsy.ru/communi- ties/35901/926887/, accessed on 07.12.2020].

Troitskii, S. V. (2001) Khristianskaia filosofiia braka [Christian philosophy of marriage]. Klin: Publishing house “Christian life”.

Velikanov, P., archpriest. (2016) “Interv'iu o mnogodetnosti i ego problemakh, dannoe ne- kogda portalu Miloserdie.Ru. Chast 1-ia” [An interview about having many children and its problems, once given to the portal Miloserdiye.ru. Part 1], Livejour- nal. O-PAULOS [https://o-paulos.livejournal.com/41525.html , accessed on 30.06.2022]

Vorob'ev, V., archpriest (2022) Liturgicheskoe predanie Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi: Pravo- slavnye tainstva i monasheskii postrig [Liturgical tradition of the Orthodox Church: Orthodox sacraments and monastic tonsure]. M.: St. Tikhon's Orthodox University Press.

Weber, M. (2016) Khoziaistvo i obshchestvo: ocherki ponimaiushchei sotsiologii. Sotsiologi- ia [Economy and Society: Essays on Understanding Sociology. Sociology]. M.: HSE University Publishing House.

Zabaev, I. V. (2011) “Logika analiza dannyh v obosnovannoi teorii (grounded theory): Ver- siia B. Glezera” [Grounded theory logics of data analysis: B. Glaeser's version], So- ciologiia: metodologiia, metody i matematicheskoe modelirovanie (4M) 32: 124142.

Zabaev, I. V., et al. (2013) Sem'ia i detorozhdenie v Rossii. Kategorii roditeVskogo sozna- niia [Family and childbearing in Russia. Categories of parental mind]. M.: St. Tikhon's Orthodox University Press.

Zabaev, I. V., Oreshina, D. A., Pruckova, E. V. (2016) Tri moskovskikh prikhoda. Osnovnye sotsiaVno-demograficheskie pokazateli i ustanovki predstavitelei obshhin krup- nykh prikhodov [Three Moscow parishes: main socio-demographic characteristics and attitudes of the large parish communities members]. M.: St. Tikhon's Orthodox University Press.

Zabaev, I. V., Kostrova, E. A. (2020) “Etos vs gabitus: eticheskii komponent v `Protestant- skoi etike' M. Vebera” [Ethos vs habitus: the ethical component in M. Weber's “Protestant Ethics”], Sotsiologiia vlasti 4: 45-67.

Zabaev, I. V., et al. (2013) “Vliianie religioznoi socializacii i prinadlezhnosti k obshhine na rozhdaemost'. Postanovka problem” [The impact of religious socialization and belonging to a religious community on fertility. The problem formulation], Demoskop Weekly 553-554 [http://demoscope.ru/weekly/20i3/0553/analit03.php, accessed on 30.11.2020].

Приложение

Таблица 1. Распределение опрошенных по городам /

Table 1. Distribution of interviewed by cities.

Таблица 2. Уровень образования опрошенных/

Table 2. Educational level of interviewed.

Таблица 3. Общая таблица респондентов с типами отношения к деторождению. ДС -- Духовная семинария, ДА -- Духовная академия, ОД -- Открытый-доверяющий тип, П -- промежуточный тип, ПР -- Планирующий-рациональный тип /

Table 3. General table of respondents with fertility types. ДС -- Theological Seminary, ДА -- Theological Academy; ОД -- Open-trusting type, П -- intermediate type, ПР -- planning-rational type