Материал: Апсе ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 2014

Внимание! Если размещение файла нарушает Ваши авторские права, то обязательно сообщите нам

1.40

K

1.30

LWR-UOX

1.20

238

239

72%Np+5.6% Pu+22.4% Pu

1.10

239

76%Np+24% Pu

1.00

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

Fig. 6.19. Dependencies of Kon fuel burn-up (% HM) for various fuel compositions

It’s a factor for internationalization of Nuclear Energy System fuel cycle. Since fuel cycles under consideration here are “rich” with respect to excess neutron generation in CFR, there is no necessity to perform fine purification of spent fuel by the SNF reprocessing technologies. It’s a factor of enhancement of NFC proliferation protection.

Application of NPP with ultra long-life core concepts is expected to be profitable for electricity generation in the developing countries which have not improved nuclear infrastructure.

216

Control questions to Chapter 6

1. What methods can be used to prevent diversion of fissile NM from

peaceful to military purposes?

2. What properties of 231Pa and 232U make it possible to use these isotopes for uranium proliferation protection?

3.What properties of 237Np and 238Pu make it possible to use these isotopes for plutonium proliferation protection?

4.What advantages can be offered by power reactors with ultra-high fuel burn-up for nuclear non-proliferation regime?

217

LIST OF RERERENCES

1.Rahn F.J., Adamantiades A.G., Kenton J.E., Braun C. A guide to nuclear power technology. A resource for decision making. – New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1984.

2.Zemlyanukhin V.I., et al. Radiochemical reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel. - Moscow, Energoatomizdat, 1989.

3.Kopyrin A.A., Karelin A.I., Karelin V.A. Technologies for fabrication and radiochemical reprocessing of nuclear fuel. – Moscow, Atomenergoizdat, 2006.

4.Apse V.A., Shmelev A.N. Nuclear technologies. – Mos cow, NRNU MEPhI, 2013.

5.Pshakin G.M., Geraskin N.I., Murogov V.M., et al. Nuclear nonproliferation. - Moscow, MEPhI, 2006.

6.Kryuchkov E.F., Geraskin N.I., Glebov V.B., et al. Technical aspects of nuclear non-proliferation. – Moscow, NRNU MEPhI, 2010.

7.Sakharov V.K. Radioecology. – Saint-Petersburg, 200 6.

8.Cohen B.L. Before It’s Too Late. – Plenum Publishin g Corporation, USA, 1983.

9.Waltar A.E. America the Powerless. – Cogito Books, USA, 1995.

10.Sokolova I.D. Advanced and innovative technologies for SNF reprocessing. – Atomic Techniques Abroad, 2009, No. 6 , pp. 3-15.

11.J. Carson Mark. Explosive Properties of Reactor-Grade Plutonium. - Science and Global Security, 1993, Volume 4, pp. 111-128.

12.Serber R. The Los Alamos Primer: the first lectures on how to build an atomic bomb. – University of California Press, 1 992.

13.Shmelev A.N., Kulikov G.G., Apse V.A. Physical factors and NM properties which define their proliferation protection. – Moscow, NRNU MEPhI, 2001.

14.Holdren J.P., Ahearne J.F., Budnitz R.J., et al. Management and disposition of excess weapons plutonium: reactor-related options. - US National Academy Press, 1995.

15.Kryuchkov E.F., Glebov V.B., Shmelev A.N., et al. Isotope denaturing of uranium. - Chapter 10 in the monograph “Uran ium compounds, isotopes and applications”, Nova Science Publishers . Inc., 2009, pp. 319-332.

218

16.Kryuchkov E.F., Tsvetkov P.V., Shmelev A.N., et al. Isotopic uranium and plutonium denaturing as an effective method for nuclear fuel proliferation protection in open and closed fuel cycles. - Chapter 14 in the monograph “Nuclear Power Deployment, Operation and Sustainability”, INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2011, pp. 3 31-362.

17.Heising-Goodman C.D. An Evaluation of the Plutonium Denaturing Concept as an Effective Safeguards Method. - Nuclear Technology, 1980, Volume 50, pp. 242-251.

18.Kessler G. Plutonium Denaturing by 238Pu. - Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2007, Volume 155, pp. 53-73.

19.Kessler G. Proliferation-proof uranium/plutonium fuel cycles. Safeguards and non-proliferation. - KIT Scientific Publishing. 2011.

20.Kulikov E.G., Shmelev A.N., Apse V.A., et al. Mathematical models for quantitative evaluations of fissile materials proliferation protection. – Communications of Higher Schools. Nuclear P ower Engineering, 2010, No. 2, pp. 184-195.

21.Kulikov E.G., Apse V.A., Kulikov G.G., et al. Non-stationary mathematical model for evaluation of plutonium proliferation protection. – Nuclear Physics and Engineering, 2011, Volu me 2, No. 1, pp. 46-54.

219

Apse Vladimir Alexandrovich

Shmelev Anatoly Nickolaevich

Kulikov Gennady Genrikhovich

Kulikov Yevgeny Gennadievich

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

IN CLOSED NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE

AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS NON-PROLIFERATION PROBLEM

Textbook

Editor I.N. Markina

The original layout is made by V.A. Apse and G.G. Kulikov

Decision on publication 30.06.2014. Format 60x84 1/16

Quires 14. Educational quires 14. Circulation 100 copies

Request №008-3, Order №

National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute) NRNU MEPhI printing house

115409, Moscow, Kashirskoe shosse, 31

Источник: https://studfile.net/preview/16708730/