Материал: Меженська Л.О., Меженський В.М. Рід Глід (Crataegus L.) в Україні інтродукція, селекція, еколого-біологічні особливості

Dai H. Molecular identification and enhancement of germplasms in hawthorn : Ph.D thesis / Shenyang Agricult. Univ., 2007. – URL: www.dissertationtopic.net/doc/1630544.‎

Dai H., Guo X., He P., Zhang Z. // In vitro embryo culture and tetraploid induction ofwhathorn // J. Fruit Sci. – 2012. – Vol. 29, No. 1.

Dai H., Guo X., Zhang Y., Li Y., Chang L., Zhang Z. Application of random amplified polymorphic DNA and inter-simple sequence repeat markers in the genusCrataegus // Annals Appl. Biol. – 2009. – Vol. 154, No. 2. – P. 175–181.

Dai H., Guo X., Zhang Y., Li Y., Li H., Zhou C., Zhang Z. Genetic diversityCrataegusof pinnatifida Bge. as evaluated by RAPD and ISSR markers// Acta Horticult. Sinica–2008. . – Vol. 35, No. 8. – P. 1117–1124.

Dandy J.E. The typification ofCrataegus oxyacantha L. // Rep. 1943–1944 / Bot. Soc. Ex-

DeVore M.L., Pigg K.B. A brief review of the fossil history of the family Rosaceae with a focus on the Eocene Okanogan Highlands of eastern Washington State, USA, and British Columbia, Canada // Pl. Syst. Evol. – 2007. – Vol. 266. – P. 45–57.

Dickinson T.A. Crataegus biosystematics. – URL: http://www.botany. utoronto.-ca/ faculty/dickinson/CRATAEGUS.HTML. – [Last updated 10. 04. 2002].

Dickinson T.A. Crataegus crus-galli L. sensu lato in Southern Ontario: Phenotypic variation and variability in relation to reproductive behavior : Ph.D thesis / Dep.Plant Sc., Univ. West. nOtario. – London (Ont.), 1983.

Dickinson T.A. Rosaceae: Maloideae–"pomes" and polypyrenous drupes // URL: http://www.botany.utoronto.ca/courses/BOT307/D_Families/307D2Rosapome.html. – [Last pu-

dated 11. 11. 2011]

Dickinson T.A. Taxonomy of agamic complexes in plants: a role for metapopulation thinking // Folia Geobot. Phytotax. – 1998. – Vol. 33. – P. 327–332.

Dickinson T.A. TheCrataegus problem. – : http://www.botany.utoronto.ca/faculty/- dickinson/CRATAEGUS2.HTML. – [Last updated 15. 02. 2003.].

Dickinson T.A., Belaoussoff S., Love R., Muniyamma M. North American black-fruited hawthorns: 1. Variation in floral construction, breeding system correlates, and their possible evolutionary significance in Crataegus sect. Douglasii Loudon // Folia Geobot. Phytotax. – 1996. – Vol. 31.

– P. 355–371.

Dickinson T.A., Campbell C.S. Population structure and reproductive ecology in the Maloideae (Rosaceae) // Syst. Bot. – 1991. – Vol. 16. – P. 350–362.

Dickinson T.A., Evans R.C., Campbell C.S. Phylogenetic relationships betweenCrataegus and Mespilus (Rosaceae subf. Maloideae) based on rDNA sequence variation // Am. J. Bot.– 2000.

– Vol. 87. – P. 122–123.

Dickinson T.A., Phipps J. B. Studies inCrataegus (Rosaceae: Maloideae). XIII. Degree and pattern of phenotypic variation in Crataegus sect. Crus-galli in Ontario // Syst. Bot. – 1985. – Vol. 10, No. 3. – P. 322–327.

Dickinson T.A., Phipps J.B. Studies in Crataegus L. (Rosaceae: Maloideae). XIV. The breeding system of Crataegus crus-galli sensu lato in Ontario // Ibid. – 1986. – Vol. 73. – P. 116–130.

215

Dickinson Т.А, Lo E.Y.Y., Talent N., Love R.M. Black-fruited hawthorns of western North America – one or more agamic complexes? // Botany. – 2008. – Vol. 86. – P. 846–865.

DickinsonT.A. Topodeme differentiation in Ontario taxaCrataegusof (Rosaceae: Maloideae): leaf morphometric evidence // Can. J. Bot. – 2011. – Vol. 64, No. 11. – P. 2738––2747.

DickinsonT.A., Lo E., Talent N. Polyploidy, reproductive biology, and Rosaceae: understanding evolution and making classifications // Pl. Syst. Evol. – 2007. – Vol. 266. – P. 59–78.

Dinesh Kumar, Vikrant Arya, Zulfi qar Ali Bhat,Nisar Ahmad Khan, Deo Nandan Prasad. The genus Crataegus: chemical and pharmacological perspectives // Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. Braz. J. Pharmacogn. – 2012. – Vol. 22, No. 5. – P. 1187–1200.

Dippel L. Handbuch der Laubholzkunde. – Berlin : P.Parey, 1893. – Bd. 3. -752 S.

Dönmez A.A. A new species of Crataegus (Rosaceae) in Turkey // Bot. J. Linn. Soc.– 2005.

– Vol. 148. – P. 245–249.

Dönmez A.A. Taxonomic notes on the genus Crataegus (Rosaceae) in Turkey // Ibid. – 2007.

– Vol. 155. – P. 231–240.

Dönmez A.A. The genus Crataegus L. (Rosaceae) with special reference to hybridisation and biodiversity in Turkey // Turk. J. Bot. – 2004. – Vol. 28. – P. 29–37.

Dönmez A.A.,Dönmez E.O. Crataegus turcicus (Rosaceae), a new species from northeast Turkey // Ann. Bot. Fenn. – 2005. – Vol. 42: 61–65.

Dönmez E.O. Pollen morphology in TurkishCrataegus (Rosaceae) // Bot. Helv.– 2008. – Vol. 118. – P. 59–70.

Dou D., Leng P., Li Y., Zeng Y., Sun Y. Comparative study of antioxidant compounds and atiradical properties of the fruit extracts from three varieties ofCrataegus pinnatifida // J. Food Sci. Technol. – DOI 10.1007/s13197-010-0954-6 (published online 16 March 2013)

Dvorsky K.A. Bracteoles in Crataegus (Rosaceae) : M.Sc thesis /Univ. West. Ontario.– London (Ont.), 2007. – 105 p.

Dzhangaliev A. D., Salova T. N., and Turekhanova P. M. The Wild Fruit and Nut Plants of Kazakhstan // Hort. Rev. – 2003. – Vol. 29. – P. 305–371.

Edwards J.E., Brown P.N., Talent N., Dickinson T.A., Shipley P.R. A review of the chemistry of the genus Crataegus // Phytochem. – 2012. – Vol. 79. – P. 5–26.

Eggleston W.W. Crataegus L. // Britton N.L., Brown A. An illustrated flora of the Northern United States. – N.Y. : C.Scribner's Sons, 1913. – Vol. 2. – P. 294–321.

Eggleston W.W. Crataegus L. // House H.D. Annotated list of the ferns and flowering plants of New York state – N.Y. St. Mus. Bull. – 1924. – No. 254. – P. 414–430.

Eggleston W.W. Crataegus L. // Nomenclatorial notes regarding certaine New York state plants : Rep. State Botanist for 1921. – N.Y. St. Mus. Bull. – 1923. – No. 243–244. – P. 63–65

Eggleston W.W. Crataegus of Dutchess County, New York // Torreya–. 1906. – Vol. 6. – Р. 63–67.

Eggleston W.W. New North American Crataegi // Ibid. – 1907. – Vol. 7. – Р. 35–36.

Eggleston W.W. Sketch of theCrataegus problem, with special reference to work in the South // J. New York Bot. Gard. – 1910. – Vol. 11. – P. 78–83.

Eggleston W.W. The Crataegi in Fort Frederick, Crown Point, New York // Torreya.– 1904.

– Vol. 4. – 38–39.

Eggleston W.W. The Crataegi of Mexico and Central America // Bull. Torrey Bot. Club–. 1909. – Vol. 36. – P. 501–514.

Eggleston W.W. TheCrataegi of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada // Rhodora. – 1908. – Vol. 10. – P. 73–84.

216

Egolf D.R., Anne O.A. A checklist ofPyracantha cultivars / USDA, U.S. Arb. Contrib–. 1995. – No. 8. – 97 p.

El-Gazzar A. The taxonomic significance of leafmorphology in Crataegus (Rosaceae) // Bot. Jahrb. Syst. – 1980. – Vol. 101. – P. 457–469.

El-Gazzar A., Bodawi A.A. The taxonomic significance of chromosome numbers and geography in Crataegus (Rosaceae) // Phytologia. – 1977. – Vol. 35. – P. 271–275.

Endlicher S. Genera plantarum. – Vindobonae : Fr. Beck Univ. Bibliopolam, 1836–1840. – 60 S. Engler A. Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. – Berlin : Gebrüder Borntraeger, 1904. – 237 S. Evans R.C. Floral development of 10-and 20-stamen morphotypes of Crataegus section

Douglasii : MSc thesis / Univ. Toronto. – Toronto, 1994.

Evans R.С. Molecular, morphological, and ontogenetic evaluation of relationships and evolution in the Rosaceae : Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Toronto. – Toronto, 1999.

Evans R.C., Alice L.A., Campbell С.S., Kellogg E.A., Dickinson T.A. The granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) gene in the Rosaceae: multiple loci and phylogenetic utility // Mol. yPhlogenet. Evol. – 2000. – Vol. 17. – P. 388–400.

Evans R.C., Campbell С.S. The origin of the apple subfamily (Maloideae; Rosaceae) is clarified by DNA sequence data from duplicated GBSSI genes //Am. J. Bot–.2002. – Vol. 89. – P. 1478–1484.

Evans R.C., Dickinson T.A. Floral ontogeny and morphology in subfamily Spiraeoideae Endl. (Rosaceae) // Inter. J. Plant Sci. – 1999. – Vol. 160. – P. 981–1012.

Evans R.C., Dickinson T.A. North American black-fruited hawthorns: II. Floral development of 10and 20-stamen morphotypes of Crataegus section Douglasii Loud. // Am. J. Bot. – 1996. – Vol. 83. – P. 961–978.

Evreinoff V.A. Notizen über Ursprung, Biologie und Sorten der Mispel // Deutsche Baumschule. – 1954. – S. 260–265.

Facciola S.Cornucopia – a source book of edible plants.– Kampong Publications, 1990. – 667 p. Feng H.,Guo S.,Meng Q.,Huang Y., Li M., Li Y., Wang G. Analysis of the relative relation-

ship of different hawthorn cultivars by RAPD // J. Fruit Sci. – 2009. – Vol. 26, No. 5. – P. 729–732. Fingerhuth C.A. Einiges zur deutschen Flora // Linnaea. – 1829. – Bd. 4. – S. 372–386.

Focke W.O. Rosaceae // Engler A., Prantl K. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien–.Leipzig : Engelmann, 1894. – Bd. 3. – S. 1–61.

Foster S., Hobbs C. Hawthorn: А literature review // HerbalGram. – 1990. – Vol. 22. – P. 19.

– URL: http://www.herbalgram.org/wholefoodsmarket/herbalgram/issueindex.asp?i=22.

Franco J. do Amaral. Crataegus L. // Flora Europaea / T.G. Tutin [et al.] (eds). – Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1968. – Vol. 2. – P. 73–77.

Gandoger M. Flora Europaeterrarumque adjacentium [Crataegus L.]. – Parisiis : FSavy,. 1886. – Vol. 8. – P. 41–59.

Gandoger M. Novus conspectus florae Europae–. Parisiis : A.Hermann et fil. ; Lipsiae : Th.O. Weigel, 1910. – 541 p.

Gandoger M. Révision du genre Crataegus, pour les sections des C. oxyacantha L. et C. oxyacantoides Thuill. // Bull. Soc. Bot. France. – 1871. – Vol. 18, Fasc. 1. – P. 442–452.

Giorgio V., Gallotta A., Losciale P. Іdentification and bio-agronomical study of seven biotypes of AzaroleCrataegus( azarolus L.). – URL: http://www.pgrforum.org/Documents/- Conference_posters/Giorgio_et_al.pdf. – [Cited 30. 12. 2011].

Gleason H.A., Cronquist A. Manual of vascular plants of Northeastern United States anddajacent Canada [Crataegus L.]. – N.Y. : Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1963. – P. 389–398.

217

Goldblatt P. Cytotaxonomic studies in the tribe Quillajeae (Rosaceae) // Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. – 1976. – Vol. 63. – P. 200–206.

Gostynska-Jakuszewska M., Hrabětová-Uhrová A. Distribution of Crataegus species in Poland and Czechoslovakia // Preslia. – 1983. – Vol. 55, No. 1 – P. 16–19.

Graham C.J., Aulds R.K., Herrington B.E. Jr. Tolerance of mayhaw clones to quince rust // LAES Res. Summary. – 2000. – No. 118. – P. 71–74.

Graham C.J., Laws S.C., Gibson A.The influence of rootstock on ‘Royalty’ mayhaw production // Ibid. – 2004. – No. 164. – P. 17–19.

Grey A. Manual of the botany of the Northern United States–. ed.2. – N.Y.: J.P.Putman & Co, 1856. – 739 p.

GRIN – Germplasm Resources Information Network / USDA, ARS, Nat. Genet. Res. Progr. – Species Records of Crataegus. – URL: http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/splist.pl?3040. – [Cited 26. 12. 2011].

Grisebach A. Spicilegium florae Rumelicae et BithyniaCrataegus[ L.]. – Brunsvigae : F.Vieweg et fil., 1843. – Vol.1(1). – P. 87–90.

Gu C., Spongberg S.A. Crataegus L. // Flora of China / Z.Wu, P.H.Raven (eds..) – Beijing : Sc. Press ; St. Louis (Miss.) : Miss. Bot. Gard. Press, 2003. – Vol. 9. – P. 111–117.

Guo L., Zhou S., Zhang Z., Shen X., Cao Y., Zhang D., Shu H. Relationships of species,yhbrid species and cultivars in genusMalus revealed by AFLP markers //Scientia Silvae Sinicae–. 2009. – Vol. 45, No. 4. – P. 33–40.

Guo T., Jiao P. Hawthorn Crataegus( ) resources in China // HortScience. – 1995. – Vol. 30, No. 6. – P. 1132–1134.

Ğutmanis K., Cinovskis R. Introducēto vilkābęlu sugu auglų kįmiskais sastāvs // Tautsaimniecībā derīgie augi. IV. – Rīgā : Zinātne, 1968. – P. 21–29.

Hammer K., Perrino P. AzzeroloCrataegus( azarolus L.) – a rare fruit tree in South// Gleditschia. – 1985. – Vol. 13, No 1. – P. 107–111.

Han X., Liang Y.,Wang Y., Li F.,Guo T., Xue Y. // Analysis of the origin and classification of C. brettschnederi by ISSR markers // J. Jilin Agricult. Univ. – 2009. – Vol. 31. – No. 2. – P. 164–167.

Hatch L.C. Cultivars of woody plants. Vol. I: A-G . – Digitial PDF eBook – Raleigh (NC) : TCR Press, 2011. – 1031 p. // URL: http://members.tripod.com/hatch_l/woodyAG.pdf.

Hickey L.J. Changes in the angiosperm flora across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary // Catastrophes and Earth History / W.A. Berggren, J.A. Van Couvering (eds–.).Princeton (NJ) : Princeton Univ. Press. – 1984. – P. 279–313.

‘Homestead’ Arnold hawthorn : Release brochure / USDA ; Natural Resources Conservation Service, Plant Materials Center–. Bismarck (ND), 1988.– URL: http://www.plant-materials.- nrcs.usda.gov/pubs/ndpmcrb11303.pdf.

Hopkins D.M. The Cenozoic history of Beringia– a synthesis // TheBering Land Bridge / D.M. Hopkins (ed.). – Stanford : Stanford Univ. Press, 1967.– P. 451–484.

Hrabetova Uhrova A. Addition to the taxonomy ofCrataegus in Czechoslovakia // Preslia. – 1973. – Vol. 45, No. 2. – P. 108–111.

Hrabětová-Uhrová A. Hloh Crataegus( L.) v Československu // Ibid. – 1969. – Vol. 41, No. 2. – Р. 162–182.

Hrabětová-Uhrová A. Taxonomic additions toCrataegus in Slovakia // Biologia.– 1970. – Vol. 25, No. 7. – P. 497–499.

Hrabětová-Uhrová A. The correct nomenclature ofCrataegus oxyacantha // Ibid. – 1974. – Vol. 46, No. 3. – P. 230–233.

218

Hummer K.E., Pomper K.W., Postman J., Graham C.J., Stover E., Mercure E.W., Aradhya M., Crisosto C.H., Ferguson L., Thompson M.M., Byers P., Zee F. Emerging Fruit Crops // Handbook of Plant Breeding. – 2012. – Vol. 8. – P. 97–147.

ICBN – International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code) / J.McNeill [et al.] (eds.). – 2006. – Regnum Veg. 146. – URL: http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn/frameset/0001Viennatitle.htm

ICBN – International Сode of Botanical Nomenclature (St. Louis Code) / W.Greuter [et al.] (eds.). – 2000 – Regnum Veg. 138. – URL: http://www.bgbm.fu-berlin.de/iapt/nomenclature/code/- SaintLouis/0001ICSLContents.htm

ICBN – International Сode of Botanical Nomenclature / W.Greuter [et al.] (eds.). – 1988. – Regnum Veg. 118. – 328 p.

ICN – International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi and Plants (Melbourne Code) / J. McNeill [et al.](eds.). – 2012. – Regnum Veg. 154. – URL: http://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/- main.php?page=com

IPNI – International Plant Names Index/– URL: http://www.ipni.org/index.html. – [Cited 03.03.2013].

ITIS (The PLANTS database, version 5.1.1)–. URL: http://wwwitis. .usda.gov/servlet/- SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=24539. – [Cited 27.03.2005].

ITIS (Rosaceae of North America Update, database version 2011)–. URL: http://www.itis.- gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=501773. – [Cited 08. 03. 2013].

Jacquin N.J. Florae Austricae. – Viennae : L.J. Kaliwoda, 1775. – Vol. 3. – 466 p.

Jakštas V. Lietuvoje auganciu gudobeles (Сrataegus L.).Genties augalu fitochemines sudeties ivertinimas : dakt. dis. / Kauno med. univ–. Kaunas, 2005. – 107 p. – URL: http://etd.library. lt/urn?etd-LABT20050920-110042-50028.

Janjić N. Nova kombinacija u lepezolisnog ili krivočašičnog gloga, Crataegus rhipidophylla Gand. // Works Fac. For. Univ. Sarajevo. – 2002. – Vol. 1. – P. 1–7.

Jiang Y., Dong W. Diversity analysis of morphological characters in hawthorn germplasm resources // Northern Fruits. – 2009. – No. 1. – P. 8–10.

Jing S., Li B. Studies on description system of haw form germplasm resources // Acta Hort. Sinica. – 1990. – Vol. 17, No. 2. – P. 81–88.

Jolicoeur C. Hawthorn for pear–.URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/nafex/2004January/author.html#640.

Juárez Pérez N., Ortiz Estrella E., Borys M.W. Diferenciación floral en tejocoteCrataegus( pubescens(H.B.K.) Steud) // Rev. Chapingo : Ser. Hort. –1995.– Vol. 1, No. 4. – P. 39–46.

Jussieu A.L. de. Genera plantarum. – Parisiis : V.Herissant ; T.Barrois, 1789. – 498 p. Kaleniczenko J. Description monographique des diversesécesp du genreCrataegus

cultivées aux environs de Kharkow dans les jardins. – Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscou. – 1874. – T. 48, № 3. – С. 1–62.

Kalkman C. The Malesian species of the subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae) // Blumea.– 1973.

– Vol. 21. – P. 413–442.

Kalkman C. The phylogeny of the Rosaceae // Bot. J. Linn. Soc. – 1988. – Vol. 98. – P. 37–60. Kalkman С. Rosaceae // The families and genera of vascular plants / K. Kubitzki (ed.–).

Berlin : Springer, 2004. – Р. 343–386.

Kang H.-C.; Shim K-.K.; Ha Y-.M., Lee W-.H. New varieties with thornless branches of Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge // Korean J. Horticult. Sci. Technol–. 2002. – Vol. 20, No. 3.– P. 252–256.

Karp D. Tejocote: No longer forbidden // Fruit Gardener. – 2010. – Vol. 42, No. 6. – P. 10–13.

219