11. Юдин А. В. Злоупотребление процессуальными правами в гражданском судопроизводстве: автореф. дис. ... д-ра юрид. наук. СПб., 2009. 47 с.
12. Яндукова А. А. Фальсификация доказательств в арбитражном процессе // Фундаментальные и прикладные исследования в современном мире. 2016. №16-3. С. 130-131.
13. Brunchweiler A., Giroud S., Raetzo N. Switzerland / International Civil Procedure - Second Edition. Juris Publishing. Inc. 2019.
14. Brum A. Mediation in Italy. URL: https://mediate.com/articles/BruniA1.cfm. November 2011 (дата обращения: 07.01.2020).
15. Cadiet L. Introduction to French Civil Justice System and Civil Procedural Law. URL: http: //www. ritsumei. ac .j p/acd/ cg/law/lex/ rlr28/CA DIET3.pdf (дата обращения: 07.01.2020).
16. D'Urso L. Italy's Mediation Law: An Overview. URL: https://www.imimediation.org/ 2017/06/22/italys-mediation-law-an-overview/ (дата обращения: 07.01.2020).
17. Gottwald P. Civil Procedure Reform in Germany // American Journal of Comparative Law. 1997. Vol. 45, № 4.
18. Iannini A. Italian Legislation on Mediation. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/Reg-Data/etudes/note/join/2011/453175/IPOL-JURI _NT(2011)453175_EN.pdf.
19. Maleshin D., Silvestri E., Sitgikov R., Valeev D. Reforming Russian Civil Procedure // Russian Law Journal. 2016. № 4(1). Pp. 142-147. DOI:10.17589/2309-8678-2016-4-1-142-147.
20. Ragu A., Artus Ch. Stay Informed Reform of the French Civil Procedure: Labour Litigation Impacted? // The National Law Review. 2020. March. URL: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/reform-french-civil-procedure-labour-litigation -impacted (дата обращения: 04.03.2020).
21. Schutze R. A. International Civil Procedure Law in the German Code of Civil Procedure (Zpo): Kommentar (de Gruyter Kommentar) / Hardcover, 504 p. Published August 28th 2008 by Walter de Gruyter.
22. Ruhl G. Preparing Germany for the 21st Century: The Reform of the Code of Civil Procedure // Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1017/ S2071832200014036. URL: https://www. cambridge. org/core/j ournals/german-law-j ournal/ article/preparing-germany-for-the-21st-century-the-reform-of-the-code-of-civil-procedure/653046EA1A39A6F0A16D813BB 2683366 (дата обращения: 07.01.2020).
23. Silvestri E. Too Much of a Good Thing: Alternative Dispute Resolution in Italy. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3253620 78_Too_much_of_a_good_thing_Alternative_Dispute_Resolution_in_Italy. DOI: 10.5553/TMD/138638782017 021004007.
References
1. Antoshin A. N. Rassmotrenie zayavleniy o falsifikacii dokazatel'stv v arbitrazhnom processe [Consideration of Applications Concerning Falsification of Evidence in Commercial Proceedings]. Zakonnost' - Legality. 2011. Issue 5. Pp. 52-55. (In Russ.).
2. Grel' Ya. V. Zloupotrebleniya storon processual'nymi pravami v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom processe: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Abuse of Procedural Rights by the Parties in Civil and Commercial Proceedings: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Novosibirsk, 2006. 207 p. (In Russ.).
3. Evseev E. F. Nekotorye voprosy vzyska- niya kompensacii za fakticheskuyu poteryu vremeni v grazhdanskom processe [Some Questions Concerning the Recovery of Compensation for the Effective Time Loss in a Civil Trial]. Advokat - Lawyer. 2013. Issue 12. Pp. 31-41. (In Russ.).
4. Zhukov A. A. Processual'nye obyazannos- ti i sankcii v sfere dokazyvaniya [Procedural Duties and Sanctions in the Field of Evidence]. Yuridi- cheskaya nauka - Legal Science. 2015. Issue 4. Pp. 187-192. (In Russ.).
5. Zagidullin M. R . Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' v rossiyskom Civilisticheskom processe: istoriko-pravovoe issledovanie [Legal Responsibility in the Russian Civil Process: Historical and Legal Research]. Moscow, 2019. 143 p. (In Russ.).
6. Kalinina M. V. Kompensaciya za faktcheskuyu poteryu vremeni: problemy pravoprime- neniya [Compensation for Actual Loss of Time: Enforcement Problems]. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy process - Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure. 2010. Issue 6. Pp. 21-23. (In Russ.).
7. Ovanesyan G. M. Grazhdanskiy process: vozmozhen li privod dlya eksperta, specialista i perevodchika? [The Civil Procedure: Is It Possible for an Expert, a Specialist, and an Interpreter to Be Brought before the Court?]. Yuridicheskiy fakt - Legal Fact. 2018. Issue 28. Pp. 25-30. (In Russ.).
8. Parfir'ev D. N. Problemy shtrafnoy grazhdansko-processual 'noy otvetstvennosti [Problems of Penal Civil Procedural Responsibility]. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy process - Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure. 2014. Issue 3. Pp. 18-23. (In Russ.).
9. Shan'kin D. A. Kompensaciya za fakticheskuyu poteryu vremeni [Compensation for the Actual Loss of Time]. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosu- darstvennogo universiteta - The Buryat State University Bulletin. 2013. Issue 2. Pp. 173-176. (In Russ.).
10. Shevchenko I. M. K voprosu ob istrebova- nii dokazatel 'stv v arbitrazhnom processe [Revisiting Disclosure of Evidence in the Arbitration Procedure]. Rossiyskiy sud'ya - Russian Judge. 2016. Issue 7. Pp. 16-20. (In Russ.).
11. Yudin A. V. Zloupotreblenie processual'- nymi pravami v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: avtoref dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Abuse of Procedural Rights in Civil Proceedings: Synopsis of Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2009. 47 p. (In Russ.).
12. Yandukova A. A. Fal'sifikaciya dokaza- tel'stv v arbitrazhnom processe. [Falsification of Evidence in the Arbitration Process]. Fundamen- tal'nye i prikladnye issledovaniya v sovremennom mire - Fundamental and Applied Research in the Modern World. 2016. Issue 16-3. Pp. 130-131. (In Russ.).
13. Brunchweiler A., Giroud S., Raetzo N. Switzerland. International Civil Procedure - Second Edition. Juris Publishing Inc., 2019. (In Eng.).
14. Bruni A. Mediation in Italy. November Available at: https://mediate.com/articles/ BruniA1.cfm (accessed 07.01.2020). (In Eng.).
15. CadietL. Introduction to French Civil Justice System and Civil Procedural Law. Available at: http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/cg/law/lex/rlr28/ CADIET3.pdf (accessed 07.01.2020). (In Eng.).
16. D'Urso L. Italy's Mediation Law: An Overview. Available at: https://www.imimediation. org/2017/06/22/italys-mediation-law-an-overview/ (accessed 07.01.2020). (In Eng.).
17. Gottwald P. Civil Procedure Reform in Germany. American Journal of Comparative Law. 1997. Vol. 45, Issue 4. (In Eng.).
18. Iannini A. Italian Legislation on Mediation. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa. eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2011/453175/IPOL -JURI_NT(2011)453175_EN.pdf.
19. Maleshin D., Silvestri E., Sitgikov R., Valeev D. Reforming Russian Civil Procedure. Russian Law Journal. 2016. Issue 4(1). Pp. 142-147. DOI: 10.17589/2309-8678-2016-4-1-142-147. (In Eng.).
20. Ragu A., Artus Ch. Reform of the French Civil Procedure: Labour Litigation Impacted? The National Law Review. March 20, 2020. Available at: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/reform-french-civil-procedure-labour-litigation-impacted (accessed 04.04.2020). (In Eng.).
21. Schutze R. A. International Civil Procedure Law in the German Code of Civil Procedure (Zpo): Kommentar (de Gruyter Kommentar). Walter de Gruyter, 2008. 504 p. (In Eng.).
22. Ruhl G. Preparing Germany for the 21st Century: The Reform of the Code of Civil Procedure. Cambridge University Press. March 06, 2019. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/ core/journals/german-law-journal/article/preparing -germany-for-the-21st-century-the-reform-of-the-code-of-civil-procedure/653046EA 1A39A6F0A16 D813BB2683366 (accessed 07.01.2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200014036. (In Eng.).
23. Silvestri E. Too Much of a Good Thing: Alternative Dispute Resolution in Italy. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3253 62078_Too_much_of_a_good_thing_Alternative_Dispute_Resolution_in_Italy (accessed. DOI: 10.5553/TMD/138638782017021004007. (In Eng.).