Материал: part17

OO.1.3 Cardiology​

Cardiac stress testing acquires images in at least two patient states, rest and stress, and typically with several different views of the​ heart to highlight function of different cardiac anatomic regions. Image review typically involves simultaneous display of the same​ anatomy at two patient states, or multiple anatomic views at one patient state, or even simultaneous display of multiple anatomic​ views at multiple states. This applies to all cardiac imaging modalities, including ultrasound, nuclear, and MR. The American College​ of Cardiology and American Society of Nuclear Medicine have adopted standard display layouts for nuclear cardiology rest-stress​ studies.​

Figure OO-5. Stress Echocardiography Structured Display​

Figure OO-6. Stress-Rest Nuclear Cardiography Structured Display​

- Standard -​

OO.1.4 Radiology​

•​A radiologist on his PACS assembles a screen layout of a stack of CT images of a current lung study, a secondary capture of a 3-​ D rendering of the CT, and a prior chest radiograph for the patient. He adjusts the window width / window level for the CT images,​ and zooms and annotates the radiograph to clearly indicate the tumor. He saves a Structured Display object representing that​ screenlayout,includingGrayscaleSoftcopyPresentationStateobjectsfortheCTWW/WLandtheradiographzoomandannotation.​ During the weekly radiology department conference, on an independent (non-PACS) workstation, he accesses the Structured​ Display object, and the display workstation automatically loads and places the images on the display, and presents them with the​ recorded WW/WL, zoom settings, and annotations.​

•​A mammographer reviews a screening exam on a mammo workstation. She wishes to discuss the exam with the patient's general​ practitioner, who does not have a mammo-specific workstation. She saves a structured display, with presentation states for each​ image that replicate the display rendered by the mammo workstation (scaling, horizontal and vertical alignment, view and laterality​ annotation, etc.).​

Figure OO-7. Mammography Structured Display​

- Standard -​

PP 3D Ultrasound Volumes (Informative)​

PP.1 Purpose of This Annex​

The purpose of this annex is to identify the clinical use cases that drove the development of Enhanced US Volume Object Definition​ for 3D Ultrasound image storage. They represent the clinical needs that must be addressed by interoperable Ultrasound medical​ devicesandcompatibleworkstationsexchanging3DUltrasoundimagedata.Theusecaseslistedherearereviewedbyrepresentatives​ of the clinical community and are believed to cover most common applications of 3D Ultrasound data.​

PP.2 3D Ultrasound Clinical Use Cases​

PP.2.1 Use Cases​

The following use cases consider the situations in which 3D Ultrasound data is produced and used in the clinical setting:​

1.​An ultrasound scanner generates a Volume Data set consisting of a set of parallel XY planes whose positions are specified rel-​ ative to each other and/or a transducer frame-of-reference, with each plane containing one or more frames of data of different​ ultrasound data types. Ultrasound data types include, but are not limited to reflector intensity, Doppler velocity, Doppler power,​ Doppler variance, etc.​

2.​An ultrasound scanner generates a set of temporally related Volume Data sets, each as described in Case1. Includes a set of​ volumes that are acquired sequentially, or acquired asynchronously and reassembled into temporal sequence (such as through​ the "Spatial-Temporal Image Correlation" (STIC) technique).​

3.​Any Volume Data set may be operated upon by an application to create one or more Multi-Planar Reconstruction (MPR) views​ (as in Case7)​

4.​Any Volume Data set may be operated upon by an application to create one or more Volume Rendered views (as in Case8)​

5.​Make 3D size measurements on a volume in 3D-space​

6.​An ultrasound scanner generates 3D image data consisting of one or more 2D frames that may be displayed, including​

a.​A single 2D frame​

b.​A temporal loop of 2D frames​

c.​A loop of 2D frames at different spatial positions and/or orientations positions relative to one another​

d.​A loop of 2D frames at different spatial positions, orientations, and/or times relative to one another​

7.​An ultrasound scanner generates 3D image data consisting of one or more MPR Views that may be displayed as ordinary 2D​ frames, including​

a.​An MPR View​

b.​A temporal loop of MPR Views​

c.​A loop of MPR Views representing different spatial positions and/or orientations relative to one another​

d.​A loop of MPR Views representing different spatial positions, orientations, and/or times relative to one another​

e.​AcollectionofMPRViewsrelatedtooneanother(example:3mutuallyorthogonalMPRViewsaroundthepointofintersection)​

8.​An ultrasound scanner generates 3D image data consisting of one or more Volume Rendered Views that may be displayed as​ ordinary 2D frames, including​

a.​An Rendered View​

b.​A temporal loop of Rendered Views​

- Standard -​

c.​A loop of Rendered Views with a varying observer point​

d.​A temporal loop of Rendered Views with a varying observer point​

Note​

Images in this group are not normally measurable because each pixel in the 2D representation may be comprised of​ data from many pixels in depth along the viewing ray and does not correspond to any particular point in 3D-space.​

9.​Allow successive display of frames in multi-frame objects in cases 6, 7, and 8.​

10.​Make size measurements on 2D frames in cases 6, 7, and 8.​

11.​Separationofdifferentdatatypesallowsforindependentdisplayand/orprocessingofimagedata(forexample,colorsuppression​ to expose tissue boundaries, grayscale suppression for vascular flow trees, elastography, etc.)​

12.​Represent ECG and other physiological waveforms synchronized to acquired images.​

13.​Two-stage Retrieval: The clinician initially queries for and retrieves all the images in an exam that are directly viewable as sets​ of frames. Based on the review of these images (potentially on a legacy review application), the clinician may decide to perform​ advanced analysis of a subset of the exam images. Volume Data sets corresponding to those images are subsequently retrieved​ and examined.​

14.​An ultrasound scanner allows user to specify qualitative patient orientation (e.g., Left, Right, Medial, etc.) along with the image​ data.​

15.​An ultrasound scanner may maintain a patient-relative frame of reference (obtained such as through a gantry device) along with​ the image data.​

16.​Fiducial markers that tag anatomical references in the image data may be specified along with the image data.​

17.​Key Images of clinical interest are identified and either the entire image, or one or more frames or a volume segmentation within​ the image must be tagged for later reference.​

PP.2.2 Hierarchy of Use Cases​

This section organizes the list of use cases into a hierarchy. Section PP.3 maps items in this hierarchy to specific solutions in the​ DICOM Standard.​

1.​Data​

a.​3D Volume Data​

i.​ Static and Dynamic volume data (Cases 1 and 2)​

ii.​ Suitable for applications that create MPR and Render views (Cases 3 and 4)​

iii.​3D size measurements (Case 5)​

b.​2D representations of 3D volume data (Cases 6, 7, and 8)​

i.​ Static and Dynamic varieties (Case 9)​

ii.​ 2D size measurements (Case 10)​

c.​Separation of data types (Case 11)​

d.​Integrate physiological waveforms with image acquisition (Case 12)​

2.​Workflow​

a.​Permit Two-step review (Case 13)​

i.​ Review 2D representations first (potentially on legacy viewer)​

- Standard -​

ii.​ On-demand operations on 3D volume data​

b.​Frame of Reference​

i.​ Frame-relative​

ii.​ Probe-relative​

iii.​Patient-relative (Cases 14 and 15)​

iv.​Anatomical (Fiducials) (Case 16)​

c.​Identify Key images (Case 17)​

PP.3 3D Ultrasound Solutions in DICOM​

This section maps the use case hierarchy in Section PP.2.2 to specific solutions in the DICOM Standard. As described in items 1a​ and 1b, there are two different types of data related to 3D image acquisition: the 3D volume data itself and 2D images derived from​ the volume data. See Figure PP.3-1.​

Figure PP.3-1. Types of 3D Ultrasound Source and Derived Images​

PP.3.1 3D Volume Data sets​

The 3D volume data is conveyed via the Enhanced US Volume SOP Class, which represents individual 3D Volume Data sets or​ collections of temporally-related 3D Volume Data sets using the 'enhanced' multi-frame features used by Enhanced Storage SOP​ Classesforothermodalities,includingsharedandper-framefunctionalgroupsequencesandmulti-framedimensions.The3DVolume​ DatasetsrepresentedbytheEnhancedUltrasoundIOD(thestripedboxinFigurePP.3-1)aresuitableforMulti-PlanarReconstruction​ (MPR) and 3D rendering operations. Note that the generation of the Cartesian volume, its relationship to spatially-related 2D frames​ (whether the volume was created from spatially-related frames, or spatially-related frames extracted from the Cartesian volume), and​ the algorithms used for MPR or 3D rendering operations are outside the scope of this Standard.​

FunctionalGroupMacrosallowthestorageofmanyparametersdescribingtheacquisitionandpositioningoftheimageplanesrelative​ to the patient and external frame of references (such as a gantry or probe locating device). These macros may apply to the entire in-​ stance (Shared Functional Group) or may vary frame-to-frame (Per-Frame Functional Group).​

Multi-frame Dimensions are used to organize the data type, spatial, and temporal variations among frames. Of particular interest is​ Data Type used as a dimension to relate frames of different data types (like tissue and flow) comprising each plane of an ultrasound​ image (item 1c in the use case hierarchy). Refer to Section C.8.24.3.3 for the use of Dimensions with the Enhanced US Volume SOP​ Class.​

- Standard -​