13. Gorodnikova N., Gokhberg L., Ditkovskiy K. et al. (eds) (2018). Science and Technology Indicators 2018: Data Book. 2018. Moscow: HSE. 320 p.
14. Huergo E., Moreno L. (2017).Subsidies or loans?Evaluating the impact of R & D support programmes.Research Policy.Vol. 46. P. 1198-1214.
15. Istomin I.A. (2018). Izmerenie produktivnosti i rezul'tativnosti nauchnykh issledovanij: opyt SSHA [Measurement of Productivity and Effectiveness of Scientific Research: record of the USA]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya.No. 6. P. 127-141.
16. Istomin I.A. (2016). Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka nauchnykh issledovanij v SSHA: sovremennyj etap evolutsii v kontekste politicheskoj bor'by [State Support of Scientific Research in the USA: Current Evolution in the Context of Political Struggle]. Sravnitel'naya politika.Vol. 7.No. 3. P. 121-134.
17. Karakas C. (2018). Horizon Europe.Framework programme for research and innovation 2021--2027.URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2018/628254/EPRS_BRI(2018)628254 _EN.pdf(дата обращения 06.02.2019).
18. Kitova G.A. (2015). Nalogovoe stimulirovanie nauki i innovatsij v Rossii: praktika i issledovaniya [Tax incentives for science and innovation in Russia: practice and studies]. Moscow: HSE, 80 p.
19. Klochikhin E. (2013). Nauchnaya i Innovatsionnaya Politika Kitaya [Scientific and Innovation Policy of China].Mezhdunarodnye protsessy.Vol. 11.No. 2(33). P. 37-55.
20. Lee H., Park Y., Choi H. (2009). Comparative evaluation of performance of national R&D programs with heterogeneous objectives: A DEA approach. European Journal of Operational Research.Vol. 196. P. 847-855.
21. Lester J., Warda J. (2018). An international comparison of tax assistance for R&D: 2017 update and extension to patent boxes.SPP Research Paper. Vol. 11:13. The School of Public Policy Publications.University of Calgary.35 p.
22. Link A. (2011). Public/Private Partnerships in the United States.Industry and Innovation.Vol. 6(2). P. 191-217.
23. National Research Council. (2010). Advancing the Science of Climate Change. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 526 p.
24. National Science Board.(2018). Science and Engineering Indicators 2018. 1060 p. URL: https://www.
25. nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/assets/nsb20181.pdf (accessed 14.09.2018).
26. OECD.(2016a). Review of national R&D tax incentives and estimates of R&D tax subsidy rates.OECD.
27. 54 p. URL: http://www.oecd.org/sti/RDTaxIncentives-DesignSubsidyRates.pdf (accessed 14.09.2018). OECD.(2016b). Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016. OECD Publishing. Paris. 196 p. OECD. (2017). Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2017: An OECD Scoreboard. OECD Publishing, Paris. 217 p.
28. Reillon V. (2015).Horizon 2020 budget and implementation A guide to the structure of the programme. European Parliamentary Research Service.In-depth analysis. 38 p. URL: http://www.europarl.europa. eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2015/571 312/EPRS_IDA%28201 5%29571312_EN.pdf (accessed
29. .
30. Reillon V. (2016). Public-public partnerships in research.The joint programming process.European Parliamentary Research Service Briefing. 8 p. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ BRIE/2016/593474/EPRS_BRI%282016°/o29593474_EN.pdf (accessed 14.09.2018).
31. Reillon V. (2017). EU framework programmes for research and innovation. Evolution and key data from FP1 to Horizon 2020 in view of FP9.European Parliamentary Research Service.In-depth analysis. 38 p. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference = EPRS_IDA(2017) 608697 (accessed 14.09.2018).
32. Shapira P., Youtie J. (2010). The Innovation System and Innovation Policy in the United States In: Frietsch R., Schьller M. (eds) Competing for Global Innovation Leadership: Innovation Systems and Policies in the USA, EU and Asia. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer Verlag. P. 5--29.
33. Talagaeva D. (2017). Evropejskoe nauchnoe soobschestvo kak politicheskij subject [European Scientific Community as a Political Actor: Historical Evolution and Institutional Foundations] Mezhdunarodnye protsessy.Vol. 15.No. 2(49).P. 133-149.