Материал: Vestnik__2-2021

ИСТОРИЯ И РЕЛИГИЯ

Конфликт между США и Северной Кореей в 1968 году имел еще одно следствие долговременного действия: неспособность американской стороны в короткие сроки решить проблему с «Пуэбло» продемонстрировала всему миру уязвимость сверхдержавы перед атаками, сопровождающимися захватом и удержанием в заключении ее граждан. В дальнейшем Вашингтон более жестко реагировал на подобные инциденты.

Литература

1.Микоян С.А. Анатомия карибского кризиса. – М., 2006. – 1074 с.

2.Ткаченко В.П. Уроки корейского кризиса 1968 года // Проблемы Дальнего Востока. – 2008. – № 1. – C. 82–102.

3.Abrams A. Immovable Object: North Korea’s 70 Years at War with American Power. – Atlanta, 2020. – 665 p.

4.Bucher L. Bucher: my story. – Garden city, N.Y., 1970. – 446 p.

5.Butler W., Lissitzyn O., Cohen J. The Pueblo Crisis: Some Critical Reflections // Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting (1921– 1969). – Vol. 63. Perspectives for International Legal Development. – Cambridge, 1969. – P. 7–30.

6.Cheevers J. Act of war: Lyndon Johnson, North Korea, and the capture of the spy ship Pueblo. – N.Y., 2013. – 448 p.

7.Chronology of Action Regarding The Pueblo // CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov). – URL:https:// www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp70b00338r000200220049-9 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

8.Complaint by the United States. Pueblo Incident // UN. – URL: https://www.un.org/ en/sc/repertoire/66-68/Chapter%208/66-68_08-11-Complaint%20by%20the%20 United%20States.pdf (accessed: 21.02.2021).

9.Department of State report, “Pueblo Crisis: Presidential Decisions and Supplementary Chronology”, December 12, 1968. Top Secret // USS Pueblo: LBJ Considered Nuclear Weapons, Naval Blockade, Ground Attacks in Response to 1968 North Korean Seizure of Navy Vessel, Documents Show. – URL: https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/ NSAEBB453/docs/doc23.pdf (accessed: 21.02.2021).

10.Detailed Known Chronology On The Location And Seizure Of The Pueblo // CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov.). –– URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia- rdp70b00338r000200010038-4 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

11.Downs C. Over the Line: North Korea’s Negotiating Strategy. – Washington, 1999. – 440 p.

12.Duermeyer J. The Capture of the USS Pueblo, The Incident, the Aftermath and the Motives of North Korea. – Jefferson, 2019. – 199 p.

13.Foreign Relations of the United States. 1964–1968. – Vol. XXIX, Part 1. – Washington, 2000. – 861 p.

14.From the Journal of N.G. Sudarikov, ‘Record of a Conversation with Ri In-Gyu, Chief of the 1st Department of the DPRK MFA’, December 21, 1968 / Wilson Center Digital Archive. – URL: https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/134211 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

15.Information about the Situation in Korea as the USSR Ambassador in Prague c. S.V. Cervonenko relayed it to the Minister of Foreign Affairs c. V. David, February, 1968. – URL: https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/116728 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

16.Informative Note concerning the Actions undertaken by the USSR in the Context of “Pueblo” Crisis, January 30, 1968 / Wilson Center Digital Archive. – URL: https:// digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/118269 (accessed 21.02.2021).

17.Inquiry into the USS Pueblo and EC-121 incidents. – Washington, 1969.

18.Lerner M. A Failure of Perception: Lyndon Johnson, North Korean Ideology, and the “Pueblo” Incident // Diplomatic History. – Vol. 25. – 2001. – No. 4. – P. 647–675.

151

ВЕСТНИК ДИПЛОМАТИЧЕСКОЙ АКАДЕМИИ МИД РОССИИ. РОССИЯ И МИР. 2021. № 2 (28)

19.Military-Political Situation in the DPRK, June 04, 1968 / Wilson Center Digital Archive. – URL: https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/114574 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

20.Note on a Conversation with the Director of the 1st Department of the Foreign Ministry of the DPRK, Comrade Ri In-Gyu, on 15 June 1968 / Wilson Center Digital Archive. – URL: https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/116730 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

21.Packard W. A Century of US Naval Intelligence. – Washington, 1996. – 515 p.

22.Philadelphia Inquirer. – 1968. – May 10.

23.Pueblo was not intruding on day of capture, U.S. says // CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov.). – URL: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp79b01709a001900060009-8 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

24.Radchenko S. The Soviet Union and the North Korean Seizure of the USS Pueblo: Evidence from Russian Archives // Cold War International History Project Working Paper. – 2005. – No. 47. – 76 p.

25.Report from East German Ambassador to North Korea, ‘Some Aspects of the Political Line of the Korean Workers’ Party after the January Events’, February 15 / Wilson Center Digital Archive. – URL: https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/113196 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

26.Report, Embassy of Hungary in the Soviet Union to the Hungarian Foreign Ministry, January 30, 1968 / Wilson Center Digital Archive. – URL: https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/ document/114571 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

27.Rubin A. Some Legal Implications of the Pueblo Incident // Comparative Law Quarterly. – Vol. 18. – 1969. – No. 4. – P. 961–970.

28.Rusk D. I Saw It. – N.Y., 1990.

29.Specific Intelligence Collection Requirement. Coastal Radars, North Korea. – 18 April 1967/ Exhibition of the Fatherland Liberation War Museum. – Pyongyang.

30.Streifer B. Anything Could Happen: Newly Declassified CIA Documents Tell an Entirely Different North Korea “Pueblo Incident” Story // North Korean Review. – Vol. 12. – 2016. – No. 2. – P. 84–104.

31.Telegram from Pyongyang to Bucharest, TOP SECRET, No. 76.024, Flash, January 27, 1968 / Wilson Center Digital Archive. – URL: https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/ document/113948 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

32.Telegram from Pyongyang to Bucharest, TOP SECRET, No. 76.025, Flash, January 29, 1968 / Wilson Center Digital Archive. – URL: https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/ document/113949 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

33.Telegram from Pyongyang to Bucharest, TOP SECRET, No. 76.027, Urgent, January 29, 1968 / Wilson Center Digital Archive. – URL: https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/ document/113951 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

34.Telegram from Pyongyang to Bucharest, TOP SECRET, No. 76.040, Regular, February 12, 1968 / Wilson Center Digital Archive. – URL: https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/ document/113955 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

35.Telegram from Pyongyang to Bucharest, TOP SECRET, No. 76.046, Urgent, February 19, 1968 / Wilson Center Digital Archive. – URL: https https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/ document/113958 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

36.Telegram from Pyongyang to Bucharest, TOP SECRET, No. 76.049, Flash, February 23, 1968. – URL: https https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/113962 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

37.Telegram from Pyongyang to Bucharest, TOP SECRET, No. 76.054, Urgent, March 01, 1968 / Wilson Center Digital Archive. – URL: https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/ document/113965 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

38.Telegram from Pyongyang to Bucharest, TOP SECRET, No. 76.068, Urgent, March 17, 1968 / Wilson Center Digital Archive. – URL: https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/ document/113967 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

39.The Pueblo incident. Analysis of North Korean Evidence. – Washington, 1968 // YouTube. – URL: https://youtu.be/q9ZPCwDeSFU (accessed: 21.02.2021).

40.ThePuebloIncident;NorthKoreanSeizureOfThePueblo–PlanOrOpportunity?//CIAFOIA (foia.cia.gov.). – URL: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/0000267787 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

152

ИСТОРИЯ И РЕЛИГИЯ

41.U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (далее – U.S. NARA). RG 59. General Records of the Department of State. Central Foreign Policy Files, 1967–1969. Box 2263. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US Telegram from Amembassy, Seoul to Secretary of State. 1968. February 7.

42.U.S. NARA. Box 2263. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Legal Issues in Pueblo Incident. 1968. February 8.

43.U.S. NARA. Box 2263. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Telegram from Amembassy, Seoul to Secretary of State. 1968. February 12.

44.U.S. Box 2263. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Telegram from Amembassy, Seoul to Secretary of State. 1968. February 4.

45.U.S. NARA. Box 2263. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Telegram to Embassy in Moscow from Department of State. 1968, February 6.

46.U.S. NARA. Box 2267. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Contingency Instructions for closed Panmunjom Talks. 1968. February 15.

47.U.S. NARA. Box 2267. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Department of State to all diplomatic Posts on Pueblo case. 1968. March 15.

48.U.S. NARA. Box 2267. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Telegram from Amembassy, Seoul to Secretary of State. 1968. February 15.

49.U.S. NARA. Box 2267. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Telegram from Amembassy, Seoul to Secretary of State. 1968. February 16.

50.U.S. NARA. Box 2267. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Telegram from Department of State to Amembassy, Seoul. 1968. February 15.

51.U.S. NARA. Box 2267. POL 33-6 KORN-US. DEF 6-245. Memorandum of Conversation on Pueblo incident. 1968. February 16.

52.U.S. NARA. Box 2268. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Draft Telegram to Embassy, Seoul. 1968. March, 11; 41.

53.U.S. NARA. Box 2268. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Letter from E. V. Rostow to O. Schroeder Jr. 1968. March 1.

54.U.S. NARA. Box 2268. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. TELECON. 1968. February 24.

55.U.S. NARA. Box 2268. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Telegram from Department of State to Amembassy, Seoul. 1968. March 8.

56.U.S. NARA. Box 2269. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Joint State/Defence Message to Amembassy, Seoul, COMUS Korea. 1968. March 15.

57.U.S. NARA. Box 2269. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Winthrop C. Brown to the Under Secretary. 1968. March 15.

58.U.S. NARA. Box 2270. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Memorandum for the President on USS Pueblo. 1968. March 14.

59.U.S. NARA. Box 2270. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Summary 28th meeting at Panmunjom December 22. 1968. December 22.

60.U.S. NARA. Box 2270. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Telegram from Amembassy, Seoul to Secretary of State. 1968. October 23.

61.U.S. NARA. Box 2271. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Talking points on Pueblo with Dobrynin. 1968. July 17; 13, p. 693–696.

62.U.S. NARA. Box 2272. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Department of State to Amembassy, Seoul on Mail for Pueblo Crew. 1968. March 28.

63.U.S. NARA. Box 2273. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Memorandum of Conversation on Status of Pueblo Negotiations. 1968. September 24.

64.U.S. NARA. Box 2273. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Telegram from Department of State to Amembassy, Moscow. 1968. September 21.

65.U.S. NARA. Box 2274. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Telegram from Department of State to Amembassy, Moscow. 1968. December 14.

66.U.S. NARA. Box 2274. POL 33-6 KORN-US. Warsaw 4956. Telegram from Department of State to Amembassy, Moscow. 1968. October 24.

67.U.S. NARA. Box 2275. Pol 33-6 KOR N-US. Memorandum from James F. Leonard to Bromley Smith. 1968. December 19.

68.United States Assistant to the President (1968). Notes of the President’s Lunch Meeting with Senior American Advisors // ProQuest. – URL: https://search-proquest-com. ezproxy.usr.shpl.ru/docview/1679085120 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

153

ВЕСТНИК ДИПЛОМАТИЧЕСКОЙ АКАДЕМИИ МИД РОССИИ. РОССИЯ И МИР. 2021. № 2 (28)

69.United States Central Intelligence Agency Directorate of Intelligence (1968). [North Korea Remains Unyielding in Pueblo Crisis] // ProQuest. – URL: https://search-proquest-com. ezproxy.usr.shpl.ru/docview/1679099122 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

70.United States. Department of Defense. Assistant Secretary for Systems Analysis (Acting) (1968). Record of meeting on January 25, 1968 // ProQuest. – URL: https://search- proquest-com.ezproxy.usr.shpl.ru/docview/1679061610 (accessed: 21.02.2021).

71.Washington Post. – 1968. – Dec. 19.

72.Washington Post. – 1968. – Feb. 6.

73.Washington Post. – 1968. – March 28.

74.Washington Post. – 1968. – May 13.

75.Washington Star. – 1968. – March 7.

154

ИСТОРИЯ И РЕЛИГИЯ

Нарышкин Андрей Александрович,

кандидат политических наук, управляющий директор ООО «РГ Консалтинг», Холдинг «Росгеология», Москва.

Andrey A. Naryshkin,

Ph.D. (Political Science),

Managing Director, RG Consulting, RosGeo, Moscow. E-mail: andr-naryshkin@yandex.ru

РОЛЬ ЗАРУБЕЖНЫХ ПРЕДСТАВИТЕЛЬСТВ В ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ ДИПЛОМАТИИ СОВЕТСКОГО СОЮЗА

THE ROLE OF FOREIGN MISSIONS IN

THE ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY OF THE SOVIET UNION

Аннотация: выстраивание взаимодействия с зарубежными странами в экономической сфере — важнейшая часть экономической дипломатии. Продвижение экономических интересов государства и других экономических агентов за рубежом не является новацией последних десятилетий: это — часть истории международных отношений и, безусловно, истории нашей страны. Впервые задачи по поиску новых каналов сбыта продукции, изучению законодательства и конъюнктуры основных европейских рынков, повышению информированности зарубежных потребителей о российской продукции были поставлены Петром I. Эти задачи были возложены на консулов Российской империи за рубежом. Конец 1910 х годов — непростой период в жизни нашей страны. Тем не менее понимание важности налаживания внешнеэкономических связей обусловило формирование системы зарубежных торговых представительств нового советского государства. В статье рассмотрен период формирования и функционирования системы зарубежных представительств торгово экономической направленности сначала Советской России, а затем СССР. Понимание истории формирования и практики эффективной работы торговых представительств Советского Союза за рубежом служит ключом к переосмыслению текущей деятельности зарубежных представительств Российской Федерации и повышению ее эффективности.

Ключевые слова: экономическая дипломатия, зарубежные представительства, торговые представительства, продвижение экспорта.

Abstract: broadening economic cooperation with foreign countries is an essential part of economic diplomacy. Economic interests’ promotion is essential for the state and other economic agents abroad. It is not an innovation of recent decades but the part of the history of international relations and, of course, countries’ history.For the first time tasks to expand the market and promotion of Russian goods, studying the legislation and foreign market conditions was set by Peter the 1st. During that period the Russian Empire Consuls were responsible for those tasks. Late 1910s was a difficult period in our country’s history. Understanding the importance of broadening foreign economic relations led to the new soviet trade representations system formation. This article reviews the Soviet period of foreign trade representation formation

155