Мы видим необходимость дальнейшего создания универсальной технологий перевода традиционных команд в распределенные, а также изучения успешного дизайна внутреннего взаимодействия последних. Результаты проделанной работы показали противоречие, выявленное в теоретическом анализе, на практике, что указывает на необходимость изучения данного феномена в разных по функциям и типам распределенных командах с целью выявления закономерностей. Это необходимо для разработки эффективного work design виртуальных команд, что, как было выявлено, является актуальным запросом бизнеса.
Список литературы
1. Адизес, И. Стили менеджмента - эффективные и неэффективные / Ицхак Калдерон Адизес; Пер. с англ. - М.: Альпина Бизнес Букс, 2010. - 199 с.
2. Базаров Т.Ю., Рыбкин И.В., Пыркова Т.С. Управленческие команды и их формирование [Текст] / Выпуск 1. М.: РАГС, 1997. - 138 с.
3. Базаров, Т.Ю. Психология управления персоналом: Учебник и практикум для академического бакалавриата - Люберцы: Юрайт, 2016. - 381 c.
4. Базаров, Т.Ю. Управление персоналом. Практикум. - М: Юнити-Дана, 2009, - 240 с.
5. Белбин М.. Типы ролей в командах менеджеров. Пер. с англ. М. HIPPO. 2003. - 232 с.
6. Вебер А.В., Данилов А.Д., Шифрин С.И. Knowledge-технологии в консалтинге и управлении предприятием. - СПб.: Наука и Техника, 2003. - 176 с., ил.
7. Зинкевич-Евстигнеева Т.Д., Фролов Д.Ф., Грабенко Т.М. Теория и практика командообразования. Современная технология создания команд / под ред. Т.Д. Зинкевич-Евстигнеевой. СПб.: Речь, 2014. 304 с.
8. Карякин, А. Командная работа: основы теории и практики: Учебное пособие /А. Карякин. - М. Менеджмент, 2009. - 317 с.
9. Пригожин А.И. Методы развития организаций. - М.: МЦФЭР, 2003.
10. Сартан Г.Н. Тренинг командообразования. СПб.: Речь, 2015. 187 с.
11. Хентце Й., Каммель А. Как преодолеть противодействие запланированным организационным изменениям. - Международный журнал: Проблемы теории и практики управления, 2007. - №3, 80-83 с.
12. Amabile, T. M. 1996. Creativity and innovation in organizations (Vol. 5). Boston: Harvard Business School.
13. Anawati, D., & Craig, A. 2006. Behavioral adaptation within cross-cultural virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49: 44-56.
14. Anderson, A. H., McEwan, R., Bal, J., & Carletta, J. 2007. Virtual team meetings: An analysis of communication and context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23: 2558-2580.
15. Andres, H. P. 2012. Technology-mediated collaboration, shared mental model and task performance. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 24: 64-81.
16. Andressen, P., Konradt, U., & Neck, C. P. 2012. The relation between self-leadership and transformational leadership: Competing models and the moderating role of virtuality. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19: 68-82.
17. Axtell, C., Hislop, D., & Whittaker, S. 2008. Mobile technologies in mobile spaces: Findings from the context of train travel. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66: 902-915.
18. Baard, S. K., Rench, T. A., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. 2014. Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review. Journal of Management, 40: 48-99.
19. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22, 273-285.
20. Balthazard, P. A., Waldman, D. A., & Warren, J. E. 2009. Predictors of the emergence of transformational leadership in virtual decision teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 20: 651-663.
21. Baskerville, R., & Nandhakumar, J. 2007. Activating and perpetuating virtual teams: Now that we're mobile, where do we go? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 50: 17-34.
22. Bйlanger, F., Watson-Manheim, M. B., & Swan, B. R. 2013. A multi-level sociotechnical systems telecommuting framework. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32: 1257-1279.
23. Bjшrn, P., & Ngwenyama, O. 2009. Virtual team collaboration: Building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence. Information Systems Journal, 19: 227-253.
24. Boros, S., Meslec, N., Curseu, P. L., & Emons, W. 2010. Struggles for cooperation: Conflict resolution strategies in multicultural groups. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25: 539-554.
25. Bosch-Sijtsema, P. M., & Sivunen, A. 2013. Professional virtual worlds supporting computer-mediated communication, collaboration, and learning in geographically distributed contexts. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 56: 160-175.
26. Bosch-Sijtsema, P. M., Fruchter, R., Vartiainen, M., & Ruohomaki, V. 2011. A framework to analyze knowledge work in distributed teams. Group & Organization Management, 36: 275-307.
27. Brahm, T., & Kunze, F. 2012. The role of trust climate in virtual teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27: 595-614.
28. Breu, K., & Hemingway, C. J. 2004. Making organizations virtual: The hidden cost of distributed teams. Journal of Information Technology, 19: 191-202.
29. Breuer, C., Hьffmeier, J., Hibben, F., & Hertel, G. (2019). Trust in teams: A taxonomy of perceived trustworthiness factors and risk-taking behaviors in face-to-face
30. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-847.
31. Carstens, D. S.,Richardson, G. L., &Smith, R. B. (2013). Project management tools & techniques. New York: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group
32. Carter, K. M., Mead, B. A., Stewart, G. L., Nielsen, J. D., & Solimeo, S. L. (2018). Reviewing work team design characteristics across industries: Combining meta- analysis and comprehensive synthesis. Small Group Research, 50, 138-188.
33. Chi, S.-P., Chang, Y.-Y., & Tsou, C.-M. 2012. The effect of team characteristics and communication environment to the virtual team performance. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 10: 137-152.
34. Clark, W. R., Clark, L. A., & Crossley, K. 2010. Developing multidimensional trust without touch in virtual teams. Marketing Management Journal, 20: 177-193.
35. CLEAR, T., MacDonell, S.G. (2011). Understanding technology use in global virtual teams: Research methodologies and methods. Information and Software Technology, 53(9). 994-1011.
36. Cohen, R. L. 2010. Rethinking “mobile work”: Boundaries of space, time and social relation in the working life of mobile hairstylists. Work, Employment and Society, 24: 65-84.
37. Coppola, N. W., Hiltz, S. R., & Rotter, N. G. 2004. Building trust in virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47: 95-104.
38. Crisp, C. B., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. 2013. Swift trust in global virtual teams: Trusting beliefs and normative actions. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12: 45-56.
39. Culnan, M. J., McHugh, P. J., & Zubillaga, J. I. 2010. How large U.S. companies can use Twitter and other social media to gain business value. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9: 243-259.
40. Cummings, J. N., & Haas, M. R. 2012. So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33: 316-341.
41. Dineen, B. R. 2005. TeamXchange: A team project experience involving virtual teams and fluid team membership. Journal of Management Education, 29: 593-616.
42. Duarte, D., &Snyder, N. (1999). Mastering virtual teams. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43. Duranti, C. M., & de Almeida, F. C. 2012. Is more technology better for communication in international virtual teams? International Journal of e-Collaboration, 8: 36-52.
44. Fineman, S., Maitlis, S., & Panteli, N. 2007. Themed articles: Virtuality and emotion. Introduction. Human Relations, 60: 555-560.
45. Fiol, C. M., & O'Connor, E. J. 2005. Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions. Organization Science, 16: 19-32.
46. Forester, G. L., Thoms, P., & Pinto, J. K. 2007. Importance of goal setting in virtual project teams. Psychological Reports, 100: 270-274.
47. Foster, M. K., Abbey, A., Callow, M. A., Zu, X., & Wilbon, A. D. (2015). Rethinking virtuality and its impact on teams. Small Group Research, 46, 267-299.
48. Furumo, K. 2009. The impact of conflict and conflict management style on deadbeats and deserters in virtual teams. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49: 66-73.
49. Ganesh, M. P., & Gupta, M. 2010. Impact of virtualness and task interdependence on extra-role performance in software development teams. Team Performance Management, 16: 169-186.
50. Geister, S., Konradt, U., & Hertel, G. 2006. Effects of process feedback on motivation, satisfaction, and perfor- mance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 37: 459-489.
51. Gibbs, J. L., Sivunen, A., & Boyraz, M. (2017). Investigating the impacts of team type and design on virtual team processes. Human Resource Management Review, 27, 590-603.
52. Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 451-495.
53. Gilson, L. L., Lim, H. S., Litchfield, R., & Gilson, P. W. in press. Creativity in teams: Directions for future research. In C. E. Shalley, M. A. Hitt, & J. Zhou (Eds.), Oxford handbook of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneur- ship. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
54. Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., & Bergiel, E. B. 2013. Virtual team effectiveness: An experiential activity. Small Group Research, 44: 412-427.
55. Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41, 1313-1337. doi:10.1177/0149206314559946
56. Goh, S., & Wasko, M. 2012. The effects of leader-member exchange on member performance in virtual world teams. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13: 861-885.
57. Golden, T. D., & Raghuram, S. 2010. Teleworker knowledge sharing and the role of altered relational and techno- logical interactions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31: 1061-1085.
58. Han, H. J., Hiltz, S. R., Fjermestad, J., & Wang, Y. Q. 2011. Does medium matter? A comparison of initial meeting modes for virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 54: 376-391.
59. Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. 1996. Re-place-ing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work: 67-76. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
60. Harvey, M., Novicevic, M. M., & Garrison, G. 2005. Global virtual teams: A human resource capital architecture. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16: 1583-1599.
61. Henderson, L. S. 2008. The impact of project managers' communication competencies: Validation and extension of a research model for virtuality, satisfaction, and productivity on project teams. Project Management Journal, 39: 48-59.
62. Henttonen, K., & Blomqvist, K. 2005. Managing distance in a global virtual team: The evolution of trust through technology-mediated relational communication. Strategic Change, 14: 107-119.
63. Herbert A. Simon. Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought. Richard T.Ely Lecture // American Economic Review, May 1978, v.68, no.2, p.1-16. ? American Economic Association, 1978 Перевод д.э.н. К.Б.Козловой и М.А.Бланко
64. Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. 2005. Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15: 69-95.
65. Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. 2012. Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99: 390-403.
66. Holtbrьgge, D., Schillo, K., Rogers, H., & Friedmann, C. 2011. Managing and training for virtual teams in India. Team Performance Management, 17: 206-223.
67. Horwitz, F. M., Bravington, D., & Silvis, U. 2006. The promise of virtual teams: Identifying key factors in effective- ness and failure. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30: 472-494.
68. Hosseini, M. R., Zuo, J., Chileshe, N., & Baroudi, B. (2015). Evaluating virtuality in teams: A conceptual model. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27, 385-404.
69. Johnson, S. K., Bettenhausen, K., & Gibbons, E. 2009. Realities of working in virtual teams: Affective and attitudinal outcomes of using computer-mediated communication. Small Group Research, 40: 623-649.
70. Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. 2007. The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quarterly, 31: 783-808.
71. Kim, T., McFee, E., Olguin, D. O., Waber, B., & Pentland, A. (2012). Sociometric badges: Using sensor technology to capture new forms of collaboration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 412-427.
72. Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team vir- tuality. Journal of Management, 31, 700-718.
73. Kirkman, B. L., Cordery, J. L., Mathieu, J., Rosen, B., & Kukenberger, M. 2013. Global organizational communi- ties of practice: The effects of nationality diversity, psychological safety, and media richness on community performance. Human Relations, 66: 333-362.
74. Kirkman, B. L., Gibson, C. B., & Kim, K. 2012. Across borders and technologies: Advancements in virtual team research. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), Oxford handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 1: 789-858. New York: Oxford University Press.
75. Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. 2004. The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 175-192.
76. Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S. 2012. Electronic media variety and virtual team performance: The mediating role of task complexity coping mechanisms. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55: 325-344.
77. Koutsabasis, P., Vosinakis, S., Malisova, K., & Paparounas, N. 2012. On the value of virtual worlds for collaborative design. Design Studies, 33: 357-390.
78. LEE-KELLEY, L., Sankey, T. (2008). Global virtual teams for value creation and project success: A case study, International Journal
79. Liu, Y. C., & Li, F. C. 2012. Exploration of social capital and knowledge sharing: An empirical study on student virtual teams. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 10: 17-38.
80. Luse, A., Mennecke, B., & Triplett, J. 2013. The changing nature of user attitudes toward virtual world technology: A longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 29: 1122-1132.
81. Margaret R. Lee (2014). Leading Virtual Project Teams: Adapting Leadership Theories and Communications Techniques to 21st Century Organizations. [Электронный ресурс]: http://www.gbv.de/dms/zbw/739986074.pdf
82. Marks, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Mathieu, J. E. 2000. Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 971-986.
83. Martinez-Moreno, E., Gonzalez-Navarro, P., Zornoza, A., & Ripoll, P. 2009. Relationship, task and process con- flicts and team performance: The moderating role of communication media. International Journal of Conflict Management, 20: 251-268.
84. Martins, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. 2011. Creativity in virtual work: Effects of demographic differences. Small Group Research, 42: 536-561.
85. Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. 2004. Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30: 805-835.
86. Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. L. 2008. Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34: 410-476.
87. Maynard, M. T., Kennedy, D. M., & Sommer, S. A. (2015). Team adaptation: A fifteen-year synthesis (1998-2013) and framework for how this literature needs to “adapt” going forward. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 652-677.
88. Mennecke, B. E., Valacich, J. S., & Wheeler, B. C. (2000). The effects of media and task on user performance: A test of the task-media fit hypothesis. Group Decision and Negotiation, 9, 507-529.
89. Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. 1996. Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research: 166-195. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
90. Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2008). Job and team design: Toward a more integrative conceptualization of work design. In J. J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 27, pp. 39-91). London, England: Emerald.
91. O'Neill, T. A., Hancock, S. E., Zivkov, K., Larson, N. L., & Law, S. J. (2016). Team decision making in virtual and face-to-face environments. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25, 995-1020.
92. Ocker, R. J. 2005. Influences on creativity in asynchronous virtual teams: A qualitative analysis of experimental teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48: 22-39.
93. Parker, S. K. (2014). Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 661-691.
94. Pasmore, W. A. (1988). Designing effective organizations: The sociotechnical sys- tems perspective. New York, NY: John Wiley.
95. Penarroja, V., Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., & Hernandez, A. 2013. The effects of virtuality level on task-related collaborative behaviors: The mediating role of team trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 29: 967-974.
96. Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. 2004. Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. ACM SIGMIS Database, 35: 6-36.
97. Pridmore, J., & Phillips-Wren, G. 2011. Assessing decision making quality in face-to-face teams versus virtual teams in a virtual world. Journal of Decision Systems, 20: 283-308.
98. Puhl, T., Tsovaltzi, D., & Weinberger, A. (2015). Blending Facebook discussions into seminars for practicing argumentation. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 605-616.
99. Purvanova, R. K., & Bono, J. E. 2009. Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 20: 343-357.
100. Quigley, N. R., Tesluk, P. E., Locke, E. A., & Bartol, K. M. 2007. A multilevel investigation of the motivational mechanisms underlying knowledge sharing and performance. Organization Science, 18: 71-88.
101. Qureshi, S., & Vogel, D. 2001. Adaptiveness in virtual teams: Organisational challenges and research directions. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10: 27-46.
102. Rosen, B., Furst, S., & Blackburn, R. 2007. Training for virtual teams: An investigation of current practices and future needs. Human Resource Management, 45: 229-247.
103. Ruggieri, S. 2009. Leadership in virtual teams: A comparison of transformational and transactional leaders. Social Behavior and Personality, 37: 1017-1022.
104. Sallnдs, E.-L. 2005. Effects of communication mode on social presence, virtual presence, and performance in col- laborative virtual environments. Presence, 14: 434-449.
105. Schreiber, M., & Engelmann, T. (2010). Knowledge and information awareness for initiating transactive memory system processes of computer-supported collaborating ad hoc groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1701-1709.
106. Schulze, J., & Krumm, S. (2017). The “virtual team player”: A review and initial model of knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics for virtual collaboration. Organizational Psychology Review, 7, 66-95.
107. Schweitzer, L., & Duxbury, L. 2010. Conceptualizing and measuring the virtuality of teams. Information Systems Journal, 20: 267-295.
108. Society for Human Resource Management. 2012. Virtual teams. http://www.shrm.org/research/surveyfindings/articles/pages/virtualteams.aspx. Accessed January 15, 2014.
109. Towers, I., Duxbury, L., & Higgins, C. 2006. Time thieves and space invaders: Technology, work, and organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19: 593-618.
110. van der Kleij, R., Schraagen, J. M., Werkhoven, P., & De Dreu, C. K. W. 2009. How conversations change over time in face-to-face and video-mediated communication. Small Group Research, 40: 355-381.
111. Vartiainen, M., & Hyrkkдnen, U. 2010. Changing requirements and mental workload factors in mobile multi-locational work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 25: 117-135.